View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Fine for a medieval/Anglo-Saxon sibset, but not today
In medieval and Anglo-Saxon times, it was normal and accepted to name siblings (multiple or singleton) with the same element, in your case bert.Today, however, such a thing is not liked. It's seen as confusing, and potentially damaging to the process of individualisation amongst siblings (especially multiples).Personally, I agree with today's view. I am, however, fine with the practice if it's for a sibset in a historical story. (Though triplets are exceedingly rare naturally: only one in 8,000, on average.)

Miranda
"Come... you must eat my child." — From a badficProud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

O.K., It's for a story, but not an historical one at all. Maybe I should have said that sooner...oh well. That's interesting about the Medeival, however. I never knew that.~*|Bethany|*~
___________________________________
"To thine own self be true; and it must follow, as the night the day, thou can'st not then be false to any man"
Hamlet, Act i, Sc.3
__________________________________
vote up1
Check out Edward I of England's 18 kidsI made a post about him in January: http://snipurl.com/fvg7.This is a fairly good example of what I mean about the Anglo-Saxons liking to name children with the same element.
Miranda
"Come... you must eat my child." — From a badficProud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.
vote up1
I *heart* Royals with many children!It gives a good taste as too what the overall naming style was to an era
*Lala*
To Destiny
vote up1