New Post
Search
Help[Facts] That's true in the case of Robin, but . . .
in reply to a message by reza
. . . it certainly isn't the case with all bird names. Wren, for example, is occasionally used for girls these days, but was certainly not in use as a personal name prior to its use for the bird
(http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=wren). Likewise for Lark (http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=lark)
Just because you find the use of the word "peacock" as a name a little ridiculous doesn't mean that some Greek parents of the early 1900s did not think it was lovely.
♦ Chrisell ♦
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
(http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=wren). Likewise for Lark (http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=lark)
Just because you find the use of the word "peacock" as a name a little ridiculous doesn't mean that some Greek parents of the early 1900s did not think it was lovely.
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
This message was edited 8/10/2005, 6:29 AM
1
Replies
I agree Chrisell! Taste for names evolves and there is no accounting for it. In the early 20th century, Pagona was indeed quite chic. Today it is on the picturesque side, unless one is a dedicated ornithologist.
1