View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] I would pronounce it with a very hard G
in reply to a message by Bear
DAGG-mar as in "daggmask" (earthworm). I'm Swedish and I think the Danish has a softer pronounciationa (mushy we say about the Danish pronounciation in Sweden, unkind neighbours as we are ;)Dagmar sounds very old-fashioned to me, I prefer Damaris which to me sounds exotic."You sought a flower and found a fruit. You sought a spring and found a sea. You sought a woman and found a soul. You are disappointed." (Edith Södergran 1891-1923)
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Oh, what a connoation, daggmask! And I like Dagmar. It sounds poetic to me.Damaris is great.
- - - Katja - - -
vote up1
ROFL! Mushy?Well, okay I can live with that description of us. ;-PWe use to say here, that you almost sing the words and names, and that I really like. But your right, we do have a much more softer way, of pronouncing names and words. Then again, we seems to be spelling almost everything entirely different, but somehow we always seems to understand each other. In every way on that matter. ♠Charlie Blue♣
!'s & ?'s In My Profile.
Follow The Evidence, It Cannot Lie!
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
Grissom & Sara CSI!
vote up1
"Grötig" in SwedishBut this may be that we Swedes have such a hard time understanding Danish. The Danish have it easier to understand Swedish. It cannot (God forbid :) be b/c the Danish are more intelligent; ergo it is b/c they speak mushy.Yes, we speak sing-songy but we think the Norwegians talk even more sing-songy."You sought a flower and found a fruit. You sought a spring and found a sea. You sought a woman and found a soul. You are disappointed." (Edith Södergran 1891-1923)
vote up1
Why don't we move this to The Lounge?Then we don't hog this board. ;-)I'll give my reply over there. ♠Charlie Blue♣
!'s & ?'s In My Profile.
Follow The Evidence, It Cannot Lie!
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
Grissom & Sara CSI!
vote up1