View Message

New Post
Search
Help
[Opinions] Re: Jackson for a girl.
by abbasdaughter
9/21/2008, 3:15 AM
in reply to a message by Carleigh
I wouldn't even use it for a boy (and for a girl, it would cause too much confusion)... It's a surname... and a silly trend.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

Jackson for a girl.  ·  Carleigh  ·  9/20/2008, 11:23 AM
•I knew a girl named Jackson (and other examples)  ·  Lillian  ·  9/21/2008, 4:12 AM
•Re: I knew a girl named Jackson (and other examples)  ·  kirra  ·  9/21/2008, 11:22 AM
•Re: I knew a girl named Jackson (and other examples)  ·  Tippins  ·  9/21/2008, 11:33 AM
•Re: Jackson for a girl.  ·  abbasdaughter  ·  9/21/2008, 3:15 AM
•Well, how would you feel about Emmadaughter for a boy? nt  ·  Mar  ·  9/21/2008, 2:03 AM
•You can't be serious! It's jackSON for a reason people! nt  ·  Pink Princess  ·  9/21/2008, 1:03 AM
•Re: Jackson for a girl.  ·  Chrysanthemum  ·  9/20/2008, 4:40 PM
•Re: Jackson for a girl.  ·  bananarama  ·  9/20/2008, 4:39 PM
•Re: Jackson for a girl.  ·  Jasmine  ·  9/20/2008, 3:24 PM
•*wretches* (nt)  ·  Isla  ·  9/20/2008, 2:39 PM
•Re: Jackson for a girl.  ·  Tippins  ·  9/20/2008, 2:06 PM
•Ahh!  ·  Llewella (nsi)  ·  9/20/2008, 1:55 PM
•And I thought boy's names on girls couldn't get any worse...  ·  Callie  ·  9/20/2008, 1:47 PM
•Re: Jackson for a girl.  ·  Gracie  ·  9/20/2008, 12:15 PM
•Definitely NO /nt/  ·  MaggieSimpson  ·  9/20/2008, 12:07 PM
•No!  ·  Poppylena  ·  9/20/2008, 12:02 PM
•No!  ·  Andromache  ·  9/20/2008, 11:46 AM
•I LOVE Jackson for a girl [m]  ·  Sabrina Fair  ·  9/20/2008, 11:41 AM
•Re: Jackson for a girl.  ·  Murasaki  ·  9/20/2008, 11:34 AM
•Re: Jackson for a girl.  ·  Janan  ·  9/20/2008, 11:32 AM
•No!  ·  Rachel Shay  ·  9/20/2008, 11:31 AM