Names
Introduction
Browse Surnames
Advanced Search
Most Common
Namesakes
Submitted Surnames
Interact
Message Boards
Submit a Name
Tools
Meanings
First Name Site
Place Name Site
Menu
Sign In
Register
First Name Site
Place Name Site
Introduction
Browse Surnames
Advanced Search
Most Common
Namesakes
Submitted Surnames
Message Boards
Submit a Name
Meanings
Sign In
Register
View Message
Home
»
Message Boards
»
All Messages
New Post
Search
Any time
Advanced
Help
This is a reply within a larger thread:
view the whole thread
[Opinions] Re: Rachel, Rahel, Raquel....
by
Andromache
(Hannah Ruth)
10/11/2008, 3:23 PM
in reply to
a message by Alienor
Rachel
is ok, but overused, dated and boring in my opinion. I find
Raquel
a little trashy for some reason, and the rest ugly.
I prefer
Noa
Theresa
.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Full-text replies
▾
full-text
compact
Newest first
▾
newest
active
votes
oldest
-
Serel Channah
(floppery)
+2
10/11/2008, 3:56 PM
Dated?
I don't see how
Rachel
is dated. I mean, it's been in the top 100 since the 70s, and has never left the top 200. When's it dated to?
1
-
Andromache
(Hannah Ruth)
10/11/2008, 6:08 PM
I think it is in the UK at least.
1
-
lac
(guest)
10/11/2008, 5:06 PM
I agree.
Rachel
is timeless. I don't associate it with any particular decade.
1