[Opinions] Re: Nicknames as names?
in reply to a message by Megan LC
I feel some nicknames are fine as given names and others aren't. I really don't have any formula to determine which nicknames I feel work as given names and which don't. It's completely subjective.
For example, these are fine as given names:
Kate (not Katherine or Kathleen), Greta (not Margaret or Gretchen), Nora (not Honora or Eleanor), Nathan (not Nathaniel), Beth (not Elizabeth), Lisa (not Elizabeth)
These seem too lightweight as given names, and I feel they need the long version for formal papers, etc.:
Becky, Katie, Sally, Sadie, Millie, Lily, Daisy, Polly, Sam, Joe, Mike
These, I can't decide:
Max, Leo, Alex
And these may SOUND like nicknames, but I have heard they originally started out as given names so I think these are fine as given names:
Lucy, Julie, Sophie, Sylvie
For example, these are fine as given names:
Kate (not Katherine or Kathleen), Greta (not Margaret or Gretchen), Nora (not Honora or Eleanor), Nathan (not Nathaniel), Beth (not Elizabeth), Lisa (not Elizabeth)
These seem too lightweight as given names, and I feel they need the long version for formal papers, etc.:
Becky, Katie, Sally, Sadie, Millie, Lily, Daisy, Polly, Sam, Joe, Mike
These, I can't decide:
Max, Leo, Alex
And these may SOUND like nicknames, but I have heard they originally started out as given names so I think these are fine as given names:
Lucy, Julie, Sophie, Sylvie