View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: No nicknames, please!
in reply to a message by Lily
Well, I think when you get into singsongy pet name kinds of nicknames, any name can have them. In that case, Iris could be I or Irie or Rissy, Mara could be Mar or Marri (rhyming with Ari), and Audrey could be Audy or Rere or something. But, like Noey and Ezzie, they're not nicknames that are used as the primary way a person is addressed. I think there's a distinction there.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Hmm sure, I agree. Still it shows how you can butcher ANY name :) I actually think Ezzie for Ezra would happen. Or Ez.Hmmm but really if we could've used any name that isn't used as the primary way a person is addressed we could have basically used anything except for names like Katherine, Michael and Elizabeth. You know what I mean? I mean most names don't have long established nicknames. Lily, Hannah, Jade, Amy, Ava, Sophia, Chloe etc but they still could end up as Lil, Hannie, Jadie, Aimz, Avy, Soph and Chlo.I think the purpose of this thread was actually finding a name for which you can't think of any nicknames and it shows how it's pretty much impossible.
vote up1
I mostly meant well entrenched nicknames that everyone is likely to use without asking the parents, like Mike for Michael, Sam for Samantha, Alex for Alexander, Sophie for Sophia, etc. Calling Chloe Chlo isn't really in this category, since she'll hardly be addressed as Chlo by her boss.
vote up1