View Message

[Opinions] Bronte
a friend of mine just met a 5 yr old girl named Bronte, WDYT?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I once had a waitress named BronteI don't mind it, it's different. Not something I'd use myself, but neat to see.
vote up1
Thats kind of what I was thinking. I would much rather see Bronte than yet another Madison or Isabella but at the same time, I don't think I would actually use it.
vote up1
...that sounds like the start of a dirty limerick. ;)
vote up1
hahaha!It really does
vote up1
I once had a waitress named Bronte
Who served me at a restaurante
I found the steak's baste
Was quite void of taste
But she was much more picante
?
:P

This message was edited 2/23/2011, 8:58 AM

vote up1
LOL!
vote up1
Brilliant!:-D
vote up1
Okay, I can't resist...I once had a waitress named Bronte
With the cook she was caught in flagrante
They tried to behave
But each morning they caved-
The cook's pants were hot as picanteThank you, Llewella, for inspiring me with the word "picante." I admit, I stole it from you. ;)

This message was edited 2/23/2011, 9:39 AM

vote up1
lol! now I will never be able to hear this name without thinking of dirty limericks...
vote up1
Ooh, flagrante! I didn't think of that one. :)
vote up1
Bwahahaha! That was great, very clever. Thanks for the laugh!
vote up1
LOL
vote up1
I know that some people like this for a girl but I don't care for it at all. It just sounds manly.However, I far prefer this to the "tryndie" spelled names. At least is has some sort of literary reference, which makes it a kind of intelligent person's choice.

This message was edited 2/23/2011, 7:23 AM

vote up1
I don't like it.I think it's becoming trendy just for the sound, and I have doubt that the parents could even name a Bronte novel if they were asked. Also, it sounds like "brontosaurus."
vote up1
I don't like it. It's too surnamey and harsh-sounding.
vote up1
I saw a few years ago in a magazine - it was the name of a little girl in a picture someone had sent in. She was adorable! and it kind of made me like it. I wouldn't use it myself but if you really like the Bronte sisters, I say go for it. It is interesting and unusual but not unheard of.
vote up1
I know a boy named Bronte and he's a brute. I like it much more for a girl but I don't know if I would use it.
vote up1
It'a a GP for me. I can't decide if I really like it or just the idea of it. I have to say, hearing it on a child IRL makes me smile and it's certainly better than another kre8tyve spelling of kaylee or something.
vote up1
I'm torn on this one. It's so much better than some of the other options, so I certainly wouldn't be heartbroken to meet a little Bronte. But two things bother me. 1.) It doesn't make much sense without an accent, and accents a pain in the but in English-speaking places. 2.) It feels a little rough and makes me want to use it on a boy. But I'm pretty sure it is socially more acceptable on a girl. Alas. I just don't know.
vote up1
Yikes, I'm no fan of this name.
vote up1
I don't get it. I like the novels of the Bronte sisters as much as the next person, but Bronte is not a pretty name. It's trendy, like Monet.
vote up1
I don't like it. It's a surname, and sounds harsh on a girl. I wouldn't like it on a boy, either.
vote up1
I don't think it gets much uglier.
vote up1
I like it. I've met one girl named Bronte before.
vote up1
Trashy.Bronte is in the same vein as Princess or Nevaeh for me.Alternatively, I could imagine a Bronte with siblings named Holden and Atticus with young hipster Mother.
vote up1
absolutely disagreeIt's on my favourites list.I think it is very classy and pretty, not to mention historical, nothing like princess or nevaeh which are totally made up.think of the famous Bronte sisters
vote up1
Yeah that was their SURNAME!It's exactly the same as Princess, it's just misappropriating a different "historical" impulse. "Princess" misappropriates the idea of royalty-as-classy; "Bronte" misappropriates a vague literary connection as classy. It's totally not historical. This is not a fair argument to make. "Classy" is a really subjective (and totally abominable) term but I think it usually means used commonly by either members of the old aristocracy (Elizabeth Mary Anne Henry Alistair Philomena) or the newer, unofficial, glam-istocracy (Marilyn, Audrey). Bronte has neither of these precedents
vote up1
Literature is my life. I am aware of the Bronte sisters. I've read all of their published novels several times. Have you?The point is that most highly literate people would never choose something so obvious. It is painful. It's like naming your child Gucci to show how into fashion you are.
vote up1
It's not that bad, actually, just really surnamey trendy. I like the Bronte sisters and all, but I wouldn't use Bronte to honor them.
vote up1
Like Brontes, one of the cyclopsOne of the cyclops in Greek mythology was called Brontes. Of course I do think of the writers but the idea of someone using their surname makes me just roll my eyes.
vote up1
Random surnames of famous people = silly, imo. Also, brontosaurus.
vote up1
The mark was Bronwen, and they missed it. Or else it's Brittany with airs. The name is very "5-10 years ago," IMO. I don't think it's awful. It's not squirm-worthy, and it's not stupid. But I don't think it's very attractive, either.
vote up1
I hate Bronte. It's snooty. It shows that the parents were ignorant of the Bronte sisters. Why not use one of their FNs instead? What's wrong with Charlotte, Emily, and Anne?

This message was edited 2/26/2011, 5:04 PM

vote up1