View Message

[Opinions] Roger.
This is one name i've never liked the sound of, it's just so ugly. What names don't any of you like the sound of, that it just gets on your nerves? Thanks.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Saul, Boyd, Arne, Caleb.But I do like Roger. I never used to; I thought it had a nerdy quality to it. But then I started to read about medieval Europe, England especially. Now I associate Roger with history and I've started to like it. Not love it, but not dislike it so much. Does that make sense? I suppose if I had positive associations for Saul, etc. I might warm up to them too. To each their own.
vote up1
I can't stand Roger! Roger, Philip, Colin, etc. all seem so snippy to me. Like they all have their noses pointed in the air.
I am so tired of Alex and all names based off of it.
Olivia for some reason just makes my lip curl in disgust. I've no idea why really. The masculine version, Oliver, is one of my top 2 names but Olivia just makes me angry!
Annaliese and all the names like it--just really can't stand them! Thankfully its popularity seems to be waning as fast as it got popular (as far as I've noticed).~*~Tara Elizabeth~*~
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking."--H.L. Mencken
Some people are like slinkies. They're not really good for anything but they bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs!
vote up1
I cannot *stand* Roger! I've seen it a few times on the boards -- many people here are attracted to über-British names -- but I think it's dreadful. And you never see it now, in England at least, probably because the slang "to rodger" is the same as "to sodomise". (Sorry ...)OK, Roger rant over ... Time for some more venting ;-)Sebastian - God I hate this. It's so yuppie trendy, and so flailingly desperate to be upper class. And now that everyone and their brother has it on their list, it's even more annoying. Oh, and the sound is vile imo.John - Well, it's just the most boring name on the planet. How could anyone possibly choose it, when there are thousands of options? John is generic, the cheap cop-out name, it has no character whatsoever.Isabella - I didn't used to mind this. But lately I've been consumed with hatred for it. If I ever hear this called "classic" again, I will scream. It's been utterly destroyed by trendoids. In the 80s, it didn't make the top 1000. And now, number 7?! That is TRENDY all the way, not classic. _____________________________________________________________________Elinor"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
~ Douglas Adams

This message was edited 1/3/2006, 4:43 PM

vote up1
I agree with you on Isabella, but not on John. For many people John has religious significance as well as being a common name in families that is often handed down. It is very common, but not like Isabella, which reappeared on the scene after decades. John has been a constant classic over time. Although, nowadays you hardly ever hear it. My nephew is Derek John, John for his father.
vote up1
Agree with all of these. Completely.
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
vote up1
Hm, agree on Sebastian. [m]It's a romance-novel name.Roger, on the other hand, is only British seeming in the US if you are Anglophile enough to expose yourself to British trends... either that or I'm out of touch out here in Texas. Roger's just a name used a lot in the 50s & 60s in the US and is a bit dated, in my world. My sister's seeing a guy named Roger. Very butch, very suitable for a normal white guy in his late 30s or older. I agree with you, though, Elinor, about the "rodger" thing .. that word is heard ever so rarely here, but it does taint the name just a tiny tad. "Roger" as it is used for radio communications is a more immediate association.- chazda
vote up1
I don't think that Roger is necessarily an uber- British name. It's not my favorite name, but it is my grandfather's name, and he is of entirely Swedish stock, though he, and his mother were born in the US.

Sebastian has been one of my favorites for years, but you are right it's climbing the charts like crazy. However, I don't think its restricted to yuppies. Even classic names have gone through periods of intense popularity and trendiness. The test of a classic name is whether or not it endures beyond the trends. Names that were trendy in the 70's and 80's like Tiffany, Stephanie and Kimberly probably won't see a revival for a long time.
vote up1
I agree on Roger and SebastianBut I like John (prefer Jonathan) and love Isabella.
vote up1
Sebastian makes me think of a little, singing, red crab! The name has actually started growing on me though. The fact that it was in The Little Mermaid, one of my favorite Disney movies, would completely dissuade me from ever using it though.
I am completely opposite from you in regards to Isabella. I used to really dislike it but then all of a sudden one day, I liked it. It was odd. The same thing happened with Lucy.~*~Tara Elizabeth~*~
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking."--H.L. Mencken
Some people are like slinkies. They're not really good for anything but they bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs!
vote up1
-Alexandra, Alexandria, or any Alex name-Tanya or Tonia-All forms of Isabelle, and Amabelle.I kind of like Roger. :)
vote up1
I mostly agree with the whole Alex thing. For me though, there are a few exceptions. I like Alexia, Alessia, Alejandra, and maybe a couple more.I totally agree with Tanya. It just sounds kind of trashy to me.Isabelle is not bad, but it is becoming way too popular.Roger is my brother's name!
vote up1
Aw, I love the name Roger! I prefer the French pronunciation, though. I don't like the sounds of these names:
Jessica
Ashley
Katelyn
Veronica
Derrick
Alex~Sadie
vote up1