View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Estrid
in reply to a message by guru
What noble ancestors do you have to get that far back in your genealogy? Sven Estridsson? :) All my ancestors seem to be common people, so I can barely get further than the 17th century.Anyway, I like Estrid more than Astrid, it doesn't sound as harsh. To me they're quite normal names, with no odd associations.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Charlemagne is one of my ancestors. It would take such a long time to list all of the kings and queens from which I am descended. Once you have one in your lineage, many more will start popping up, and because the good records are there, it is not hard to find the information. The most recent royalty I am related to is the Safavid Dynasty (Persia), and the Komnenos Dynasty (Trebizond). Through them I am related to an endless string of European Royal Houses (before 1500) because of alliance marriages. There are literally so many that I wonder if I will ever be able to finish organizing the information. Listing the names of the dynasties alone would take a long time. I don't think it is reason to brag that I have royal ancestry (lots do), but I do think it is remarkable that I have access so much available information about it when most people I know don't really know much past their great-grandparents.

This particular Estrid was "Estrid of the Obotrites," mother of Princess Ingegerd Olofsdotter Of Sweden.

This message was edited 5/26/2011, 3:17 AM

vote up1
Princess Ingegerd. Just saying that out loud makes me happy. :-) You are very lucky.
vote up1
I see. Yes, I know lots of people do have royal ancestors - I almost feel more unusual not to have found any, all my ancestors are so common and Swedish that it's silly. :P But it's definitely fascinating to be able to find ancestors many generations back, both when they are 10th century royals and when they're 17th century farmers. :)
vote up1