View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Damn!
I agree, Tom, Harry, Ron, Arthur etc are all names that are more or less well used, I have heard them before, they have other connotations.
I had never heard of Asphodel until I read Harry Potter, and haven't since. Still, like Quill mentioned, it has some fantastical/mysterious qualities, and I rather like it, but it seems a little too much for real life use.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

It might well be too much for everyday use, but not because it's mentioned once in passing in HP. That's like saying "cauldron" or "robes" are too HP.
vote up1
I think that some of the fantastical/ mysterious qualities come from hearing about it for the first time in Harry Potter. At least it's intensified by it.I bought some asphodel for my garden. I also bought a monkshood.
vote up1
It was mentioned in HP because of its fantastical/mysterious qualities. The ancients planted the flowers near tombs, regarding them as the form of food preferred by the dead, and many poems refer to this custom. The name is derived from a Greek word meaning sceptre.I found that on some website. Also if you google Asphodel the first thing that comes up is Asphodel Fields. I'm sure these associations are why Rowling used the plant in the first place, much like how she used vampires and centaurs.
vote up1
I'm in the US, so I don't have the same familiarity with asphodel as she or anyone in Britain does. For me, it was the first time I heard of it.
vote up1
I'm also in the US.Point is, it's a magical plant mentioned once in passing in the Harry Potter books. I don't think that qualifies it as a "Harry Potter" name.

This message was edited 7/29/2013, 6:04 AM

vote up1