View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Pronunciation question for those who've read Hunger Games
in reply to a message by Calla
Probably because Peeta is a stupid name. "What matters most is how well you walk through the fire." -Charles Bukowski
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

lol.
vote up1
So is Peter. And Primrose. And Katniss. And many others from the series.
vote up1
...which is why I can't get into the series, even though I've tried. I know it's a stupid reason for giving up, but oh well.
vote up1
I would feel like a blue-ribbon fool ...Everytime I had to pronounce Peetah in my head.
vote up1
Nah, it's a good name nerdy reason. Really, the writing isn't that good and the story isn't super-original so you aren't missing much. The first book was good, the second book was a bit stodgy, and the third book was absolutely horrible. I think the only reason it's really popular is because it fits the generic terms for today's mainstream movie goers. Pretty girl, some fight scenes, dystopian universe. Don't get me wrong, I am a fan of the first book and I think it brings up interesting ethical questions and scenarios, but I don't think it'll be a book people will remember 100 years from now. Unless the movies persist.
vote up1
I tried reading the first book, but the way it was written really put me off. It was...too simple , or something. I know that's a douchey way to describe it, but I never felt like I got in the mind of Katniss. It's worlds better than "Twilight", but that doesn't necessarily mean it's good . The back of a cereal box is worlds better than "Twilight".Also, I'm not into dystopian stuff. I like "Brave New World" and "1984", but YA dystopia all seems the same to me. I read a synopsis on the "Divergent" series, and it sounds like Hunger Games 2.0. Think I'll be skipping that one, too.
vote up1
No, you're right, it is written very simply. It works with the story but obviously not for everyone. Of course it's better than "Twilight." Porn has better writing. I'm fairly iffy on dystopian stuff, too. I don't mind dark but dystopian just seems... pointlessly bleak. My moods are attached to the books I read so I can't read too many dark books without getting into a funk. Dystopian just makes me sigh because I already want to change the world a lot as it is! "Divergent" is not good. I tried it but... just, no. Nothing redeeming. It's a rehash of everything. Then I read the spoilers for the last book (I can't not know stuff!) and was glad I didn't force myself to read them. Eye roll inducing indeed.
vote up1
Aren't they making "Divergent" movies, too? I swear they are, and that Kate Winslet is going to be in them. I agree with dystopian being hopelessly bleak.
vote up1
Yep. The first one will be out soon. The main girl is the chick from that horrific ABC Fam show, "Average Life of an American Teenager." I think that's what it's called. I do know it starts with "Average Life." And Ashley Judd is in it, playing the mother.
vote up1
Actually, "Secret Life..."But close ;)
vote up1
Ah!! I was close. As soon as I saw this I knew I was wrong! lol. Thanks for the correction. :)
vote up1
Not that I watch it or anything...because I totally don't. Never. Ever......
vote up1
Haha!! We all have our guilty pleasures.I watch Pretty Little Liars.There!! Secret outed! lol
vote up1