New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] Re: Kardashian/Disick BA
in reply to a message by LMS
So strange compared to the sibling names. I'd expect [top 200 name that is going to blow up now] [sort-of strange middle].
But I guess this is basically the opposite, so whatever. Far from the weirdest celebrity name out there. I wonder if Reign will blow up like Mason and Penelope did.
"than you will go to jail for kidnap."
top: Helena & Evander
bottom: Samira & Kaleb
http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/59411
But I guess this is basically the opposite, so whatever. Far from the weirdest celebrity name out there. I wonder if Reign will blow up like Mason and Penelope did.
top: Helena & Evander
bottom: Samira & Kaleb
http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/59411
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
True, they were, but:
Mason was born at the end of 2009. The name Mason had been slowly rising through the 30s at that time. The next year, rocketed to 12, then to 2 the next year. 5000 extra Masons in each of the two years after Mason Disick was born.
Penelope was born mid-2012. It was definitely on the way up there, but to go from 2500 babies to 4200 babies in one year, coincidentally after a famous one? Hmmm. (I'd predict it in the 80s-90s if Penelope Disick hadn't been named Penelope.)
Yes, they were on their way up. But the Kardashians helped. Kind of like how -ella names were all pretty trendy and on the way up, but Isabella might not have ever gotten to be #1 without Twilight (Bella also peaked at the height of Twilight's popularity).
I guess I can't *prove* any of these things. You'd have to check an alternate universe.
Reign was only given to 25 boys in 2013. "Blow up" doesn't have to mean "top 100". If even 200 extra Reigns are born and it just sits right outside the top 1000, I'd consider that "blown up". The average person wouldn't know, but I would. 8)
Mason was born at the end of 2009. The name Mason had been slowly rising through the 30s at that time. The next year, rocketed to 12, then to 2 the next year. 5000 extra Masons in each of the two years after Mason Disick was born.
Penelope was born mid-2012. It was definitely on the way up there, but to go from 2500 babies to 4200 babies in one year, coincidentally after a famous one? Hmmm. (I'd predict it in the 80s-90s if Penelope Disick hadn't been named Penelope.)
Yes, they were on their way up. But the Kardashians helped. Kind of like how -ella names were all pretty trendy and on the way up, but Isabella might not have ever gotten to be #1 without Twilight (Bella also peaked at the height of Twilight's popularity).
I guess I can't *prove* any of these things. You'd have to check an alternate universe.
Reign was only given to 25 boys in 2013. "Blow up" doesn't have to mean "top 100". If even 200 extra Reigns are born and it just sits right outside the top 1000, I'd consider that "blown up". The average person wouldn't know, but I would. 8)
This message was edited 12/23/2014, 6:08 AM
1