[Opinions] Re: CALLED IT
in reply to a message by vladislava
OH well since you're not a mind reader I guess that makes it totally okay that you attack me at any opportunity.
Fay | Evander | Sky
Mavis | Ziya | Silver
www.behindthename.com/pnl/59411
Mavis | Ziya | Silver
www.behindthename.com/pnl/59411
Replies
What is going on?
A lot of the time I see you two fighting and attacking one another...
Can I ask what's going on?
Sorry if I seem rude it's just that's it's been going on for a while now...
A lot of the time I see you two fighting and attacking one another...
Can I ask what's going on?
Sorry if I seem rude it's just that's it's been going on for a while now...
I can tell you. I don't mind. She attacks he and always starts drama on here and I'm kind of tired of it.
When vladislava joined, she liked posting under multiple names. I told her to stop, it's against the rules. She PMs me, says it's none of my business, and tells me to grow up. I sent her the link to the rules with significantly less sass than she gave me. She said she'd try to not use multiple names, because she's "not trying to start anything". She continued using multiple names, other people called her out, and finally Mike C told her to stop.
Quite frankly, I was unaware we had a problem after that, but then one day out of the clear blue sky, she PMs me and says I'm bitter (???) and she's blocking me (I had not PMed her since the name thing). What's weird is that this http://www.behindthename.com/bb/baby/4663097 was the last thing I'd directed at her.
So basically I have no idea what I've done to her. I asked in a previous thread and she didn't reply.
Quite frankly, I was unaware we had a problem after that, but then one day out of the clear blue sky, she PMs me and says I'm bitter (???) and she's blocking me (I had not PMed her since the name thing). What's weird is that this http://www.behindthename.com/bb/baby/4663097 was the last thing I'd directed at her.
So basically I have no idea what I've done to her. I asked in a previous thread and she didn't reply.
Wait, can you block other members? And as for the posting under multiple names, yeah thats all her business regardless if its against the rules or not. Let her worry about that. Mike only told her to stop because because most likely someone taddledtelled on the girl. *ehhem* otherwise, I really don't think he would remotely care or stress about it. So yeah...
We're implicitly asked to help enforce rules, since Mike can't necessarily control the board closely. So it's not inappropriate to call out someone for posting under multiple names, and it's not "tattling" to signal to him that someone's repeatedly breaking rules.
If Mike C didn't care about people's posting names, it wouldn't be in the rules.
Ya that's one of the main, most-enforced board rules...
Seriously. This board has like 3 rules and it's mostly self moderated. I really don't get the point of arguing with such a simple, basic rule as keeping the same posting name.
Thank you. Everybody just wants to start stuff
This message was edited 12/7/2015, 4:11 PM
Well, I was mostly referring to you and BookemDanno because it seems like all this silliness originated from Rachel Shaina telling you to post under one name (which it seems like you've been doing) and nonsense over blocking people.
But telling people to mind their business and chastising other people for 'taddletelling' is immature, and lame. It's a board rule. It's not a hard, or unfair one.
But telling people to mind their business and chastising other people for 'taddletelling' is immature, and lame. It's a board rule. It's not a hard, or unfair one.
I never taddletelled. She's a bitch. She's been using the PM's to attack me for a long time. If you're not in the convo presaging please stay out of it. That's all I'm asking
You're the one calling her old and bitter, seems like you are the one who's attacking people. I've never seen Rachel Shaina attack anyone, so I'm more inclined to believe her.
And that's the things about forums, anyone can weigh in if they feel so inclined. Especially when it spans across several threads.
And that's the things about forums, anyone can weigh in if they feel so inclined. Especially when it spans across several threads.
I have never deleted any of my PMs and am happy to post all of my ingoing and outgoing messages to vladislava if anyone actually believes I have ever attacked her via PM.
Bull fucking shit. You've attacked me over PMs so many times. Like you don't delete them. My ass
Then why don't you prove it and post them?
Well you don't think I don't delete my messages either? Do you
You deleted them? Bulldinky.
Give me your email I'll send it to you.
Do it.
Here is my inbox (I left the names of people who have messaged me, hope that's ok with everyone, topics are irrelevant)
Please note the single double arrows next to ONE of vladislava's PMs, that is the one I replied to.
Please also note that Vladislava has just today unblocked me to send me another message.
Here is my outbox, showing ONE outgoing message to vladislava:
Also, one outgoing message to Mike, because I have decided to report this.
Here is my deleted messages:
Here is the bottom of my inbox, showing PMs from 2007:
Here is the only message I ever sent vladislava:
Hope you all enjoyed! I can post the content of HER messages when I get home from work in an hour if requested.
Please note the single double arrows next to ONE of vladislava's PMs, that is the one I replied to.
Please also note that Vladislava has just today unblocked me to send me another message.
Here is my outbox, showing ONE outgoing message to vladislava:
Also, one outgoing message to Mike, because I have decided to report this.
Here is my deleted messages:
Here is the bottom of my inbox, showing PMs from 2007:
Here is the only message I ever sent vladislava:
Hope you all enjoyed! I can post the content of HER messages when I get home from work in an hour if requested.
You go girl!
Wish I was more tech-savvy.
Wish I was more tech-savvy.
agree
No, you can block them on the PM system, which is why I noted that I hadn't PMed her since she had last PMed me. I can't send her private messages any more, which is fine because I never did in the first place. If she could actually block me, this subthread wouldn't be happening because she would not have been able to reply to me in the first place.
I'm sure you're trying to be snide and imply that I "taddletelled" (because we're 6 years old here) to Mike, but I didn't. Someone else did, or, gasp, he actually does care about his website.
I want you to apply that mentality to real world laws and see how long it takes before you get arrested.
Also, since you're so worried about people being up in everyone else's business, you can keep out of mine. Thanks.
I'm sure you're trying to be snide and imply that I "taddletelled" (because we're 6 years old here) to Mike, but I didn't. Someone else did, or, gasp, he actually does care about his website.
I want you to apply that mentality to real world laws and see how long it takes before you get arrested.
Also, since you're so worried about people being up in everyone else's business, you can keep out of mine. Thanks.
This message was edited 12/7/2015, 2:49 PM
You have PMed me before so....
I have only ever sent you 1 PM and it was a reply to a PM you sent first.
This message was edited 12/7/2015, 3:12 PM
Really....
Not trying to start drama here so I'm out. Have fun with your damn pissy party.
Not trying to start drama here so I'm out. Have fun with your damn pissy party.