I expect a girl, and like it less on a boy.
It wouldn't be odd on a baby born today, but it would be late to the party - like naming a girl
Tiffany in 2002.
Not really like naming a girl
Jennifer in 2002, because
Jennifer was so much more popular for so much longer. There are lots more Jennifers than Tiffanys out there.
I'd pick
Alexandra.
Second,
Alexandria. I don't like it, but it still sounds pretty cool when an
Alexandria introduces herself.
Third,
Alexis. Not because I like it more than
Alexa. I like
Alexa more. But if the voice assistant name catches on,
Alexa is going to drop off the chart like a lump of lead. Or it should.
I think it's ex-trendy and has the tough but not tacky, gender-neutral-ish vibe of names like
Brooke and
Ashley and
Sydney - they have (had) a "professional" sheen, like the parent was picturing the daughter growing up to be a conventional success. Yuppie. Now that they've seen some popularity on real girls, their image is more just regular name - maybe not mediocre, but not as shiny as they were when they were trendy.
Harper &
Piper will go the same way IMO. It doesn't ruin the names -
Alexis is still as usable as
Brooke and
Ashley, and I think it will be for a bit longer. But eventually it will become, I think, more like
Megan than like
Tiffany.
- mirfak