New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] Re: Why?! (+edit)
in reply to a message by Mar
She's a girl.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
:(
A little sparkle of hope I had just died :(
Would've been rather refreshing to have Virginia as a MN for a boy. I dislike the whole: "let's name our girls with boys names, but heaven forbid we should give our son a girls name, even as a MN"-type thing that's going on...
A little sparkle of hope I had just died :(
Would've been rather refreshing to have Virginia as a MN for a boy. I dislike the whole: "let's name our girls with boys names, but heaven forbid we should give our son a girls name, even as a MN"-type thing that's going on...
1
I agree. If "boys'" names are workable on girls, why can't "girls'" names be used on boys? It seems kind of patriarchal to me.
1
It is, but I take that as more of a reason to avoid using boys' names on girls than a reason to use them.
1
Exactly. You're only feeding into the sexist double standard by giving girls boys' names when it's still taboo to do the opposite.
1