View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Awful!
So, can Harper not be a boy? Why not? Hmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I mean, Harper Lee was a very famous woman, so naming a boy Harper Lee seems strange. like naming a girl...Tyler Perry, I guess lol. That's the only gender-neutral-ish-double-fn male celeb I can think of right now. Of course Tyler and Perry could be girls! But when you put them together most people think of a dude!

This message was edited 4/5/2018, 12:37 PM

vote up1
I don't know...I think it's kind of cool to name a boy after a famous woman. How often does that happen?
vote up1
ThisNot often enough! I agree it would be pretty cool
vote up1
It’s not something I would do, but interesting point! I responded the way I did because what you said before made it seem to me like you didn’t understand the basis of Caprice’s comment. Like, I think a lot of people would have an initial “oh weird” reaction to a name like we’re talking about. And I think that makes sense!
vote up1
I agree :)
vote up1
I didn't say that.
vote up1
I think it's just that Harper Lee was a famous female.
Might be odd for a boy to have that exact name now.
vote up1