[Opinions] Re: Celeb Sibling BA
in reply to a message by PeachyGirl86
Bay B. is at least better than Baby, which actually charted (https://www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi).
I think it's a harmless nature name.
Though there's something passive about it that I don't like, maybe because "at bay" implies someone's cornered. And it does also refer to barking, but oh well.
It doesn't remind me of hay fever at all.
I think it's a harmless nature name.
Though there's something passive about it that I don't like, maybe because "at bay" implies someone's cornered. And it does also refer to barking, but oh well.
It doesn't remind me of hay fever at all.
This message was edited 8/17/2018, 5:07 PM
Replies
Baby charted ...
But that doesn't actually mean it was used that much as an actual name. I mean, Unknown, Girl, Boy and Infant also charted in the past and nobody is actually named those.
But that doesn't actually mean it was used that much as an actual name. I mean, Unknown, Girl, Boy and Infant also charted in the past and nobody is actually named those.
I wonder why it charted 1984-2005 but not before or afterward.
As I recall, it charted much more frequently in the early days, before the SSA started keeping good records.
OMNG I JUST REALIZED ABOUT THE "BABY" PART! Maybe it WAS Justin's idea! lol