[Opinions] Re: Sibsets I made up
in reply to a message by Hekate Rose
Nova, Isla, Opal, Maya: I dislike Nova & Opal but they fit in decent enough with the set, stylistically.
Jayden, Isabelle, Charlotte, Elijah: Jayden ruins it. Sticks out like a sore thumb. A trendy, modern name against classic solid ones. Isabelle, Charlotte & Elijah would be MUUUUCH better.
Venus, Leona: I dislike Venus and the names don't go together.
Avery, Jayda/Jada: Decent enough names but I think they sound better in different sets.
Jade, Ruby, Opal, Pearl, Sapphire: Yeah, it's definitely corny all right but I think it would be at least sound better without 'Sapphire' which may be a gem-inspired name but it just sticks out and will always be "too out there".
Sandra, Claire, Peter, Jonathan: Classic & solid. Can't go wrong with this one.
♥★♥★♥★♥★♥★♥★♥★♥★♥★♥★♥
♀ https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/190318
♂ https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/190318/127682
Jayden, Isabelle, Charlotte, Elijah: Jayden ruins it. Sticks out like a sore thumb. A trendy, modern name against classic solid ones. Isabelle, Charlotte & Elijah would be MUUUUCH better.
Venus, Leona: I dislike Venus and the names don't go together.
Avery, Jayda/Jada: Decent enough names but I think they sound better in different sets.
Jade, Ruby, Opal, Pearl, Sapphire: Yeah, it's definitely corny all right but I think it would be at least sound better without 'Sapphire' which may be a gem-inspired name but it just sticks out and will always be "too out there".
Sandra, Claire, Peter, Jonathan: Classic & solid. Can't go wrong with this one.
♥★♥★♥★♥★♥★♥★♥★♥★♥★♥★♥
♀ https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/190318
♂ https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/190318/127682
This message was edited 11/3/2019, 2:09 PM