View Message

[Opinions] Michelangelo or Thomas?
Which of these two do you prefer?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Thomas
vote up1
This is such a funny question, the names are as different as they could be. It's like choosing between Madonna and Anne. I'd choose Thomas, Michelangelo is just too much.
vote up1
Thomas
vote up1
ThomasMichelangelo is trying way too hard.
vote up1
Thomas
vote up1
Thomas
vote up1
MichelangeloI like them about equally, tbh, but I've never liked the meaning of Thomas.
...and I've actually met a Michelangelo, but I don't think I've ever met a Thomas (at least not who went by that instead of Tom)!
vote up1
ThomasMichelangelo is a lot to live up to, and he'd probably end up as Mike anyway.Tom is a good name.
vote up1
ThomasMichaelangelo is just too much.
vote up1
Thomas. Michelangelo is mythical and pretentious. I’d come back down to earth and use Thomas.
vote up1
MichelangeloThomas is just so boring and plain. Michelangelo at least captures my attention.
vote up1
Thomas(:
vote up1
Of these two, probably Thomas. Michelangelo is a lot of name. Not sure just anyone could carry that off. Of course, Thomas is kind of the polar opposite. I've seen someone post a lot of Thomas vs. Raphael polls lately. Out of all three names, I could most see myself using Raphael.
vote up1
They couldn’t be more different to me, despite them both being classics. Michelangelo seems very self-aggrandizing and ostentatious. Thomas is sweet and humble. Will siblings ever be a possibility in the future? If so, it might help to take a look at your overall naming style and decide which of those directions you’d want to head in.For me personally, I’d choose Thomas.
vote up1
To be honest, neither. Michelangelo makes me think of the Sistine Chapel, which isn't a bad association, but I'm not fond of names having only one overriding association. Thomas is okay, but it isn't interesting. If I had to pick, then I would go with Thomas since I'm not Italian.
vote up1
Thomas
vote up1