View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Facts] Re: Names deleted in the previous update
in reply to a message by Felie
QuoteWhy aren't they added in the submitted database? If they were good for the main database so they can be saved.
Agreed! :)If the sole reason for the removal of a name is it being too uncommon or rare, but everything else about the name is valid and correct (such as the spelling and etymology), then the name should be automatically moved straight to the Submitted Names Database.It would be somewhat similar to how editors are currently able to move information from submitted names to the "Comments" section of entries in the main database. The purpose behind that is virtually the same, namely the preservation of information.

Forchta in biuonga quamon ouer mi, in bethecoda mi thuisternussi.
In ic quad: "uuie sal geuan mi fetheron also duuon, in ic fliugon sal in raston sal?"
vote up2vote down

No replies