View Message

It’s a town near me and pronounced sick-uh-more, so I don’t think of a tree, but a town and the word sick. Not a fan.

Sickie would be a good nn.
Seriously, this is one botanical name that doesn't work. Sick more. Sick amour. Yuck.

Strictly tree. m

---

Definitely not human. And, as PeachyGirl86 points out, there is the sick-a-more factor. Bad idea!

There's something Shakespearean about it. I like it. It would make a nice middle name for any gender. Or come to think of it, the right sort of person could wear it as a non binary first name. I feel this way about Cypress, too.

This message was edited 7/17/2021, 1:37 AM

Would be a really cool surname and an interesting MN. I guess if I had to gender it I'd say masc.

Oh please no.

It's syc.

---

Cool middle name for either, first name for neither.

There are better tree names
Redwood, Hawthorn, Birch, Fraser, Cypress, Pine (I knew a man named this) and the ones used currently - Magnolia, Olive, Willow, and the Ash and Oak variants.

---

Sinclair, Sanborn, Sullivan, Seymour, Snowden, Somerset, Stanmore, Stedman, Sterling

Not a fan, but it's rather genderless. I think I've heard it as a surname though

"sick-a-more"?

---

No thanks.

Don't like it