[Opinions] Re: Also
in reply to a message by Perrine
Friends-Emma would be 19, “born” in 2002 :)
I don’t think Emma is very tired, but maybe that’s because I associate it with Austen more than anything. Emily, though? Bury it in the ground.
I don’t think Emma is very tired, but maybe that’s because I associate it with Austen more than anything. Emily, though? Bury it in the ground.
Replies
Ahh, thanks, for some reason I thought it was 2000 :P
For me it is the other way around. Emily still sounds fine to me.
For me it is the other way around. Emily still sounds fine to me.
I’ve just known a lot of Emilys, maybe 10 or 12, and only one or two Emmas. Regional differences, I’m sure!