View Message

I don't like either

Nevada should remain a state name and nothing else, and Montana might be good for a dog but not a human.

Terrible. Even worse than - dare I say it - Dakota.

Nobody in my country is likely to use either one, which is fine by me. Who wants to be either Snowy or a Mountain?

Nevada is nice for a pet, but should remain a state name, as well as Montana (I wouldn't be able to meet someome or even an animal named like this and not think of Hannah Montana)

I'm not the biggest fan of these names. If you have ties to the US states, perhaps as a middle name, if anything.

Neither of these names I like, if you wild like a state name my favorites are…

---

Georgia (Love)
Dakota (Love)
Indiana (Pretty, but would never use)
Carolina (Like, it’s ok)

Honestly, I don't think either sound good. There are really only a few place-based names I like, and these are not examples of them. Thus I can't really offer any middle names that, in my opinion, would sound good with them. Sorry, I guess

Nevada isn’t bad but it’s weird.
Montana is less weird because it follows a pattern that a lot of other names do but it’s still sort of eh.

You're going through A LOT of potential names for this baby, lol.

---

Anyway, Montana sounds more name-y to me. Nevada just doesn't land the same way.

I dislike both but prefer Montana to Nevada. My favorite state name is Arizona.

Both are very silly. Montana mostly makes me think of Hannah Montana, rather than the state. Tennessee is a huge GP for me.