Replies
Vincent - 9/10
Dean - 7/10
Seth 7/10
Arthur - 5/10
Wesley - 3/10
Dean - 7/10
Seth 7/10
Arthur - 5/10
Wesley - 3/10
Order of Preference
Vincent - underused classic 9/10
Arthur - distinguished classic 8/10
Dean - a one syllable title that doesn't sound too religious 7/10
Wesley - a little lispy and weak 5/10
Seth - there are so many great Biblical names for boys and this isn't a favourite of mine 4/10
Vincent - underused classic 9/10
Arthur - distinguished classic 8/10
Dean - a one syllable title that doesn't sound too religious 7/10
Wesley - a little lispy and weak 5/10
Seth - there are so many great Biblical names for boys and this isn't a favourite of mine 4/10
This message was edited 8/28/2024, 1:53 PM
Arthur 8: classic, deserves more use
Dean 5: not a fan of lnfns or occupation names, and Dean is both
Seth 4: don't like the sound, and can't help hearing it said by someone who lisps
Vincent 3: would be lower, but for Van Gogh
Wesley 0: lnfn, limp and flabby
Dean 5: not a fan of lnfns or occupation names, and Dean is both
Seth 4: don't like the sound, and can't help hearing it said by someone who lisps
Vincent 3: would be lower, but for Van Gogh
Wesley 0: lnfn, limp and flabby
Arthur 8/10
Dean 10/10
Seth 8/10
Vincent 10/10
Wesley 10/10
Dean 10/10
Seth 8/10
Vincent 10/10
Wesley 10/10