View Message

Marjorie, Constance, James (m)
Yes, James is for a girl.What do you think of these names? How would you rank them from favorite to least favorite? What would you think if they were in a sibset? **Starfish and coffee, maple syrup and jam/Butterscotch clouds, a tangerine, and a side order of ham**
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Marjorie is an "oldie but a goodie" - a name formerly perceived as old-fashioned that I can seriously see making a comeback. It's sweet, too. (But only this spelling. I don't like Margery at all.)Constance is a childhood favorite, largely due to The Three Musketeers. I'd more likely use it as a pseudonym for myself, or a character, than on a descendant.James... well, it's not just a popular masculine name. It one of the statistically most popular masculine names in all Anglophone culture. It does not belong on baby girls. Just... stop. Please.
vote up1
Marjorie
James
ConstanceI think they all have different yet weirdly similar vibes. James is like Wallis, maybe.Marjorie seems like she'd be the sophisticated older sister.
Constance is the middle child who never wants to rock the boat.
James is the ambitious wild child, or she's like modern Amy March.

This message was edited 12/15/2020, 6:34 PM

vote up1
I like James best. I am not in favorite of it though, haha. Marjorie just makes me think of Margerine and it does not appeal no matter how I try to like it and Constance is just so stiff. James wins less on its merits than on the others' faults. If they were a set that would just feel stilted.
vote up1
I liked James, until you said for a girl. I don’t like Marjorie either, because it seems so old-fashioned and sounds like margarine. Favorite to least: Constance, Marjorie, James. I feel I saw them in a sibset, I would assume James was a boy and feel sorry for her when I found out it was a girl. Also, the others are old fashioned and James on a girl seems so modern that it doesn’t go together at all.
vote up1
I find Marjorie dated and ugly, even uglier than Margaret.Constance is nice. Not a favorite, but I would enjoy seeing it more.James is stupid on a girl. It’s fine on a boy, but on a girl it just doesn’t do.
vote up1
Hate James. Sorry, that's just unfair. I knew a Jamie (f) and even with a slightly less masculine version of the name she was always either getting called Janie or people expected a boy when they saw her name on paper. She also passionately hated her name, borderline resented her parents for calling her that, and ended up legally changing her name. It made her very miserable. Apparently Jamie can be a girls' name, but I've never met another Jamie (f) and neither had she (UK, we've both met many male Jamies, which is common here) and everyone always assumed she was a boy before meeting her - as she was a very classy, feminine young woman, she did not care for this and her name really didn't suit her. She's much happier with her new name.I don't really like unisex names on girls that much I will admit, but there's a difference between calling your girl Robin or Madison and James (and James is worse than Jamie) or Samuel. To me, at least.I dislike Marjorie, but Constance is kind of cool, in a retro battle-axe kind of way.

This message was edited 12/15/2020, 3:08 PM

vote up1
James: hate it on a girl , sorry.Marjorie: nice Constance: love it!
vote up1
double post

This message was edited 12/15/2020, 12:33 PM

vote up1
James > Marjorie > ConstanceI don't totally love James for a girl but I like it. It's just a lovely name on either gender.Marjorie is weird. Sometimes I'm hit with waves of love for it only to decide it's cumbersome five minutes later. It definitely looks great.Constance is fine but kind of anemic and flat. A bit discordant for a set in my opinion. But I don't hate it.
vote up1
James is bad and I hate it.I approve of Constance and Marjorie; they'd make me laugh on littluns, but not in a bad way. I'd be mad if James were in the sibset too.I like Constance a little more than Marjorie. Marjorie is more fun but also gross. It's like jam. I have to wash my hands. I think Constance is handsome and tidy like a crisp butter cracker. Connie is attractive to me; Marj/Marjie is just not.
vote up1
Maybe ok as a subset if James was the boy. Terrible for a girl. Marjorie is nice, Constance is ok
vote up1
I like Marjorie. I'm a little sad about people associating it with margarine - that's a pretty bad association. I don't have it myself though.
I like Constance. I'm not thrilled about how it sounds or the nn's. I like Constantia more. I would use Marjorie first.
James for a girl - its appeal to me personally is less than zero, I dislike the name and additionally dislike the usage for a girl, but it's acceptable.As a sibset: honestly I'd think, maybe they were only having three kids, and Dad really wanted a namesake so they named the last one James regardless.
vote up1
I think I’d take the trendeigh route and use Jaymes for a female James tbh.1. Marjorie
2. Constance
3. James / JaymesI think they kind of work in a set but also all kind of have their own vibes. I think Marjorie & Constance would be very nice together. James is too fresh & new as a female name to quite fit in with the other 2.
vote up1
That's hilarious! When I saw 'James (m)' I never thought there was a message ...James for a boy would rank highest, and for a girl stone last.I'd put Marjorie first: it counts as classic and is due for a come-back. And it's a family name. I also like Constance, and Con is fine but I'm not keen on Connie.I think they'd work well as a sibset: all of them pretty timeless. Of course, there is the trendiness of James (f) to consider. But the sound of the three together is fine.
vote up1
No. Also, James doesn't make a good girl's name. If they were a sibset, I'd think James is a boy.Marjorie 4/10
Constance 2/10 It sounds too close to the English word "constant".
James (for a girl) 0/10
vote up1
My ranking:
1. Marjorie
2. Constance
3. girl JamesMarjorie is seriously growing on me. I would have hated it ten years ago, but now it seems cute and warm; it's got personality. Constance has always been a "meh" name for me, I just can't get excited about it for some reason. James on a girl is....not my thing. If I met a sibset like this, I'd think there were some psychological issues at play; like they really really wanted James to be a boy, and when she was born a girl they just refused to change the name or something. I wouldn't mark this as an "edgy" set that is interested in pushing gender boundaries - both Marjorie and Constance are too conservative to make enough of a statement for that.
vote up1
Marjorie
Constance
James - I thought the (m) was for male. It's dreadful for a girl.
vote up1