New Post
Search
HelpRe: Birth Announcement
in reply to a message by Dianatiger
I don't see the logic of respelling Wyatt. None whatsoever, especially since it isn't a super popular name. It isn't as though there are bound to be like 8 other Wyatt's in his grade/school. It's an unusual spelling for sure, and also makes the parents look incredibly ignorant. (Sorry not sorry) And I agree, too many middles. Wyatt Edward Gene would have sufficed. That would had been a really solid combo.
Though I suppose the spelling could have been a lot worse and appeared even more illiterate. Whyit/Whyitt Whyet/Whyett. *Shudders*
*~Rate my PNLs!~*
https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/190318/127682 Boys
https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/190318 Girls
Though I suppose the spelling could have been a lot worse and appeared even more illiterate. Whyit/Whyitt Whyet/Whyett. *Shudders*
*~Rate my PNLs!~*
https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/190318/127682 Boys
https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/190318 Girls
This message was edited 5/18/2022, 7:02 PM
Archived Thread - replies disabled
3
Replies
Yeah the spelling at least has a sort-of logic behind it, why+at *minus the other T* The name just doesn't appeal to me even with the "proper" spelling.
1
Yeah oddly enough, her spelling actually reminds me why I don't really care for the name myself. I mean it's alright, and certainly tolerable as far as names go, but the I'd never really been able to get passed the 'Why' sound. It practically sounds like "why it" to me. /:
1