View Message

Hawk
What do you think of Hawk as a name?Do you think it's terrible? Hmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Yeah, it just doesn't work as a name.
vote up1
I think it's a bit too much, although not unusable. Perhaps it would better remain in the middle name or last name category. Actually, I find Hawk or Hawke quite charming as a last name.ETA: I second Manipura's idea of Hazel, Cliff, and Hawk as a sibset.

This message was edited 10/16/2022, 3:59 AM

vote up1
Yeah, kind of.
Because of hock as in pawn, or a hock of ham.
And hawking a loogie.I could see it, though.
It's not as bad as Puck, Chuck, Doc, Rock, Huckleberry imo.
I'm not sure if it's better or worse than Buck, Brock, Hank, Heath, Hawthorn.I used to know brothers named Bucky and Heath, and I feel like it'd fit in. Bucky, Heath, & Hawk. Or something like Hazel, Cliff, & Hawk

This message was edited 10/16/2022, 3:05 AM

vote up2
I really like Hawk. It has a pleasant sound, and I have a soft spot for animal names.
vote up1
Hawk = bird of prey, yes I suppose it's OK for bird-lovers. Hawk, as in hawking and spitting, is unthinkable.
vote up1
Hawk is a guilty pleasure of mine.
As well as...Hawke
Hawken
Hawkin
Hawkins
Hawking
Hawkley
vote up1
Sounds like hock, like you're choking something up.
vote up1
Don't like it at all
vote up2