View Message

Three of the lowest rated names on this site
Here are some names that have been extremely low rated and heavily outweigh the good ratings.Jaxxon - 1%
Jaxtyn - 10%
Tajuana - 11%Jaxxon is just godawfully terrible. Why not just go for Jackson instead?Jaxtyn is just.. well... you see...Tajuana makes me think of either Tijuana or Marijuana whenever I think of it.What do you think of them?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up2

Replies

Tajuana isn't that bad. The pronunciation might be tricky since the J in Juana usually sounds like an H, but I'm not sure that it would in Tajuana since it probably isn't used by Spanish speakers. Tajuana is a little dated rather like Tiffany or Patricia but less mainstream. I would expect a Tajuana to be in her 40s and would be shocked to encounter one still school age. There are a whole lot of names that I like much less. Jaxxon and Jaxtyn are unnecessarily complicating a familiar and simple name, so I'm on board with the negative reaction there.

This message was edited 12/13/2022, 7:27 AM

vote up1
Jackson isn’t even a bad name in itself but why that’s spelling? X is a beautiful letter when used correctly…Jaxtyn? Well hey, a new unisex name.I’m not sure what to think of Tajuana. I prefer Juana.
vote up1
Tajuana just seems like a very normal name to me. I don't like it.. but I don't like it the same way I don't like Sandra.
The other two are exceptionally bad.
vote up1
All terrible
vote up2
I think they deserved the low ratings, to be honest. But I think Tajuana is better than Jaxtyn, and Jaxtyn is better than Jaxxon. Jaxxon is just terribly awful, like it falls flat in a concrete slab.
vote up1
They’re very unattractive and it’s no surprise they’re rated poorly, considering the general taste of this website.
vote up3