Message: "Please no-!" - Behind the Name

[Opinions] Please no-!

by gaelruadh19

2/8/2009, 10:32 PM

James is far too masculine; it's akin to naming your son "Marguerite" or "Isabelle". Jamesina and Jacqueline already exist and are perfectly lovely; use them. If people keep giving boys' names to girls (like Ashley, Kelly, Madison, Leslie, and the like), these names will gradually be exclusively female turf, and to boot there is no place for men who bear feminine names.

Messages

James...for a girl (sort of) · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 5:20 PM

•Please no-! · gaelruadh19 · 2/8/2009, 10:32 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · sonny20 · 2/8/2009, 5:29 PM

•No . . . (really) · Bear · 2/8/2009, 3:22 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · Lily8 · 2/8/2009, 4:30 AM

•No... (m) · Nikki · 2/8/2009, 4:05 AM

•Re: No... (m) · gaelruadh19 · 2/8/2009, 10:34 PM

•Re: No... (m) · RegalAmethyst · 2/9/2009, 6:55 AM

•Oh No! Only Jamesetta or Jamesina. nt · I_Love_Jesus · 2/7/2009, 9:39 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · gigibee · 2/7/2009, 8:43 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · Flute · 2/7/2009, 6:34 PM

•If at all, use it as a middle name only. · gaelruadh19 · 2/8/2009, 10:35 PM

•Yes [m] · Sabrina Fair · 2/7/2009, 5:59 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · RegalAmethyst · 2/7/2009, 5:29 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 5:49 PM

•Re: Jamesina is wonderful · Bear · 2/8/2009, 4:38 PM

•Re: Jamesina is wonderful · gaelruadh19 · 2/8/2009, 10:38 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · RegalAmethyst · 2/7/2009, 5:54 PM

•True enough! nt · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 5:56 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · Laurenzia · 2/7/2009, 5:28 PM

•Ivy Jamesina is lovely!! · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 6:00 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · AnnaMichelle · 2/7/2009, 5:22 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · AnnaMichelle · 2/7/2009, 5:28 PM

•Thanks! (m) · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 5:23 PM

•Re: Thanks! (m) · AnnaMichelle · 2/7/2009, 5:24 PM

View Message

Messages