Message: "Re: No... (m)" - Behind the Name

[Opinions] Re: No... (m)

by RegalAmethyst

2/9/2009, 6:55 AM

I think it's because most parents are terrified at the idea of giving their sons names that could be thought of as feminine in the least amount, whereas parents of girls are more creative and less afraid to look outside the box for names. Just my take on it.

Messages

James...for a girl (sort of) · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 5:20 PM

•Please no-! · gaelruadh19 · 2/8/2009, 10:32 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · sonny20 · 2/8/2009, 5:29 PM

•No . . . (really) · Bear · 2/8/2009, 3:22 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · Lily8 · 2/8/2009, 4:30 AM

•No... (m) · Nikki · 2/8/2009, 4:05 AM

•Re: No... (m) · gaelruadh19 · 2/8/2009, 10:34 PM

•Re: No... (m) · RegalAmethyst · 2/9/2009, 6:55 AM

•Oh No! Only Jamesetta or Jamesina. nt · I_Love_Jesus · 2/7/2009, 9:39 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · gigibee · 2/7/2009, 8:43 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · Flute · 2/7/2009, 6:34 PM

•If at all, use it as a middle name only. · gaelruadh19 · 2/8/2009, 10:35 PM

•Yes [m] · Sabrina Fair · 2/7/2009, 5:59 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · RegalAmethyst · 2/7/2009, 5:29 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 5:49 PM

•Re: Jamesina is wonderful · Bear · 2/8/2009, 4:38 PM

•Re: Jamesina is wonderful · gaelruadh19 · 2/8/2009, 10:38 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · RegalAmethyst · 2/7/2009, 5:54 PM

•True enough! nt · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 5:56 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · Laurenzia · 2/7/2009, 5:28 PM

•Ivy Jamesina is lovely!! · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 6:00 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · AnnaMichelle · 2/7/2009, 5:22 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · AnnaMichelle · 2/7/2009, 5:28 PM

•Thanks! (m) · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 5:23 PM

•Re: Thanks! (m) · AnnaMichelle · 2/7/2009, 5:24 PM

View Message

Messages