[Opinions] Re: Names vs. Time
in reply to a message by meena
Everything is cyclical. Names that have been consistently popular for a long time, like Mary, Elizabeth, Robert, and John, will be at least moderately popular for a long time. Names that become extremely popular in a short time, like Sophia, especially ones that seem to come out of nowhere, like Madison, will also become unpopular in a short time. Past trends as well as past names are revived in time. Right now we are reviving some 1880-1900 names and the trendy spellings trend of the time. (Just as Mabel was respelled Maybelle in 1900, so is Caitlin respelled Kaitlynne today) Our children will probably think 1 syllable names are the coolest, like was popular in the 1930-1940's. Roy and Ruth will be all the rage. Everything is cyclical.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

Names vs. Time  ·  meena  ·  7/27/2010, 8:28 AM
Re: Names vs. Time  ·  Katica  ·  7/27/2010, 3:47 PM
Re: Names vs. Time  ·  Dracotorix  ·  7/27/2010, 1:04 PM
Re: Names vs. Time  ·  lac  ·  7/27/2010, 12:45 PM
Re: Names vs. Time  ·  Ilex  ·  7/27/2010, 12:22 PM
Re: Names vs. Time  ·  elsie  ·  7/27/2010, 12:19 PM
Re: Names vs. Time  ·  Telfalathiel  ·  7/27/2010, 12:01 PM
Re: Names vs. Time  ·  Valkyrie  ·  7/27/2010, 11:37 AM
Re: Names vs. Time  ·  entrophy  ·  7/27/2010, 9:06 AM