New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] Re: Hadley
in reply to a message by Lily
Butting in, but doesn't trendy mean something that becomes suddenly much more popular for a relatively short period of time?
I'm guessing that doesn't really describe Hayley, since I knew a bunch growing up in the 80s and there are still a bunch now.
So for me...HAyley would be more popular/common, but Hadley would be more trendy.
I'm guessing that doesn't really describe Hayley, since I knew a bunch growing up in the 80s and there are still a bunch now.
So for me...HAyley would be more popular/common, but Hadley would be more trendy.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Do we know whether Hadley will become popular for a short period of time? Or whether it will become popular at all? I think we don't.
We simply know more about Hayley because it has had its time in the sun and the name (by which I mean all spellings) is falling now. We don't know whether Hadley will ever make the top 150 or whether it will stay common for 5 years or 50 we can just guess.
To me trendiness has a lot to do with trendy sounds and variant spellings. Kaylynn isn't that common but super trendy. Not because it's rising quickly, but because of the variant spellings and the similarity to Caitlin. McKayley would be super trendy to me and that definitely isn't rising.
Hadley to me doesn't have any common sounds apart from the -ley ending which puts it in a group with all -ley surnames, but I wouldn't call them horribly trendy as -ley surnames as first names have been around for girls for decades starting with Shirley in the 20s. Had- is a pretty uncommon sound, I can't think of any other name that starts with it. So to me it's not that trendy.
I do admit that it might be tiny bit trendy because of its quick rise but to me just not nearly as much as Hayley, which also includes the common AY sound found in everything from Cayden to Aidan to Brayden to Kayley, Kayla, Makayla and Jayden.
I don't want to put Hayley down or anything, it's one of my favorite names. But because I like it so much I've thought about this so much and Hayley to me just includes every single element of trendy whereas Hadley I put more in a category with Aspen and Ansley or something. Maybe a bit trendy because of a rise in popularity but still quite distinctive in sound.
We simply know more about Hayley because it has had its time in the sun and the name (by which I mean all spellings) is falling now. We don't know whether Hadley will ever make the top 150 or whether it will stay common for 5 years or 50 we can just guess.
To me trendiness has a lot to do with trendy sounds and variant spellings. Kaylynn isn't that common but super trendy. Not because it's rising quickly, but because of the variant spellings and the similarity to Caitlin. McKayley would be super trendy to me and that definitely isn't rising.
Hadley to me doesn't have any common sounds apart from the -ley ending which puts it in a group with all -ley surnames, but I wouldn't call them horribly trendy as -ley surnames as first names have been around for girls for decades starting with Shirley in the 20s. Had- is a pretty uncommon sound, I can't think of any other name that starts with it. So to me it's not that trendy.
I do admit that it might be tiny bit trendy because of its quick rise but to me just not nearly as much as Hayley, which also includes the common AY sound found in everything from Cayden to Aidan to Brayden to Kayley, Kayla, Makayla and Jayden.
I don't want to put Hayley down or anything, it's one of my favorite names. But because I like it so much I've thought about this so much and Hayley to me just includes every single element of trendy whereas Hadley I put more in a category with Aspen and Ansley or something. Maybe a bit trendy because of a rise in popularity but still quite distinctive in sound.
This message was edited 12/22/2012, 4:36 PM
1