[Facts] Re: and of course, they fell for the Roman Katherine
in reply to a message by lala
Hayley = Amazing? Now, that IS amazing!But I must take issue with you on the Katharine question. Yes, certainly it was a false etymology a couple of millenia ago. But by now I think it's gained a meaning and a status of its own. Words do change their meanings, look at 'nice' and 'silly', and in this case the, admittedly sanitised, version is the one that namers want.I don't think that it's in the same league as all those strange people who were posting about Damian recently - they're mysteriously fixated on old movies, and intent upon ignoring facts. Whereas the long-ago lads who tried to find a meaning for Katharine - which is still tricky! - were actually trying to be scholarly. There's a difference!
vote up1vote down

Messages

Liora  ·  Elinor  ·  8/20/2004, 9:18 AM
Re: Liora  ·  Kandake  ·  8/22/2004, 2:02 PM
Thanks very much for the info - I've bookmarked that :-) n/t  ·  Elinor  ·  8/23/2004, 3:12 AM
P.S.  ·  Elinor  ·  8/23/2004, 3:13 AM
Re: Liora  ·  Martina  ·  8/20/2004, 7:10 PM
Um, where did that info come from? (m)  ·  Miranda  ·  8/20/2004, 10:31 PM
I just went to...  ·  Ivayla  ·  8/22/2004, 10:36 AM
Baby-Names.com is AWEFUL. Period  ·  lala  ·  8/22/2004, 11:59 AM
I know!  ·  Miranda  ·  8/22/2004, 2:37 PM
OMG  ·  beata  ·  8/22/2004, 8:03 PM
Re: OMG  ·  Elinor  ·  8/23/2004, 3:10 AM
and of course, they fell for the Roman Katherine  ·  lala  ·  8/22/2004, 5:47 PM
Re: and of course, they fell for the Roman Katherine  ·  Anneza  ·  8/23/2004, 2:49 AM
Re: Liora  ·  Claire  ·  8/20/2004, 2:00 PM
Re: Liora  ·  Jennifer27  ·  8/20/2004, 1:50 PM
Re: Liora  ·  Andy  ·  8/20/2004, 9:43 AM