[Facts] Re: Sure, I'll add it to the total
You're killin' me with these fractions, Mike! LOL!Okay, here's the online reference you'd asked for in e-mail. It's from somebody writing on RootsWeb, and quoting from the same exact passage of *Amy Vanderbilt's Etiquette* that I rely upon in matters such as these:> "A man who is a Jr., a II, a III or possibly a IV, usually needs
> to take action when the preceding holder of the name dies. A 'Jr.'
> usually drops the 'Jr.' unless there would be what I call a
> confusion in history. In other words, if the father were so well
> known and perhaps [the Jr.] himself is so well known that to drop
> the 'Jr.' might cause public confusion. As the man who is called
> 'II' is NOT named for his father BUT FOR SOMEONE ELSE, perhaps an
> uncle or a grandfather of the same name, he drops his suffix on
> the death of the holder of the name unless there is a possibility,
> too, of a confusion in history."Your online reference can be found here:http://ftp.rootsweb.com/pub/roots-l/messages/96aug/3840-- Nanaea
vote up1vote down

Messages

Junior vs. II  ·  Arthur  ·  5/31/2001, 3:17 PM
Re: Junior vs. II  ·  Arthur  ·  6/1/2001, 2:48 PM
How its done in Cyprus  ·  Pavlos  ·  6/1/2001, 3:00 AM
Re: How its done in Cyprus  ·  Phyllis  ·  6/1/2001, 9:37 PM
Re: Junior vs. II  ·  Mike C  ·  5/31/2001, 4:31 PM
Hehe, I see you have a link with the Kabalarians :P (n/t)  ·  Pavlos  ·  6/1/2001, 2:39 AM
Re: Junior vs. II  ·  Daividh  ·  5/31/2001, 9:48 PM
Errata in the last paragraphI  ·  Daividh  ·  5/31/2001, 10:30 PM
Do I get a point for this, Mike? :)  ·  Nanaea  ·  5/31/2001, 5:29 PM
Sure, I'll add it to the total  ·  Mike C  ·  5/31/2001, 10:16 PM
Re: Sure, I'll add it to the total  ·  Nanaea  ·  5/31/2001, 10:25 PM
Oops, amendment....  ·  Nanaea  ·  5/31/2001, 8:43 PM
Re: Junior vs. II  ·  Nanaea  ·  5/31/2001, 3:46 PM