New Post
Search
Help[Facts] Re: Name gender of PLEASANT
in reply to a message by leoBeyene2002
It didn't change. Your six submissions for this name were deleted.
18 boys doesn't make a name unisex. Also, the SSA data before 1935 is extremely flawed, considering Social Security didn't even exist then. The names were counted retroactively and mistakes were made.
Rosalie Isaac Larkin
Tirzah Floyd Silver
www.behindthename.com/pnl/59411
18 boys doesn't make a name unisex. Also, the SSA data before 1935 is extremely flawed, considering Social Security didn't even exist then. The names were counted retroactively and mistakes were made.
Tirzah Floyd Silver
www.behindthename.com/pnl/59411
1
Replies
The Social Security data is far from perfect. However, there are at least five boys born named Pleasant every year in the data between 1880 and 1888 and during that period it only turns up with more than five for girls once (in 1886, when there are six girls and 12 boys listed), so in the 1880s Pleasant is indeed highly likely to have been a predominantly male name in the USA.
0