[Opinions] Large sibset IRL
Frazer Arthur Brian
Roxy Louise Martha Jean
Mia Louise Angie Patricia
Kiera Angie Louise Kathryn
JJ Neil Tiny Ricky James John
Roxy Louise Martha Jean
Mia Louise Angie Patricia
Kiera Angie Louise Kathryn
JJ Neil Tiny Ricky James John
This message was edited 7/8/2023, 12:23 PM
Replies
Why would they use the same name more then once?
I guess they repeated the same family names over and over? Why use Louise 3x and Angie 2x when your kids already have too many middle names?
I'm assuming/hoping that JJ isn't part of the last brother's legal name, but his full name is "Neil Tiny Ricky James John" and he's called JJ for the "James John" part. That one also looks like he was named after several different people, one of which was called 'Tiny Ricky'?
The whole thing looks like they had a ton of people they wanted to name their kids after, but they kept using the same people's names twice, so they wasted spots and/or added extra spots where there shouldn't have even been another name. If you actually have that many unique names you want to use for honoring, then fine, give each kid 3 middle names. But clearly you don't need all that room if you're only going to repeat the same name three times.
Best case scenario without losing any of the individual names:
Frazer Arthur Brian
Roxy Martha Jean
Mia Angie Patricia
Kiera Louise Kathryn
Neil Ricky James John 'JJ'
But that still leave JJ with one extra name.
If I was forced to name these kids while honoring all these assumed people:
Brian Arthur Frazer
Martha Jean Roxanna (or Roxanna Martha Jean, could be called 'Roxy')
I'm assuming/hoping that JJ isn't part of the last brother's legal name, but his full name is "Neil Tiny Ricky James John" and he's called JJ for the "James John" part. That one also looks like he was named after several different people, one of which was called 'Tiny Ricky'?
The whole thing looks like they had a ton of people they wanted to name their kids after, but they kept using the same people's names twice, so they wasted spots and/or added extra spots where there shouldn't have even been another name. If you actually have that many unique names you want to use for honoring, then fine, give each kid 3 middle names. But clearly you don't need all that room if you're only going to repeat the same name three times.
Best case scenario without losing any of the individual names:
Frazer Arthur Brian
Roxy Martha Jean
Mia Angie Patricia
Kiera Louise Kathryn
Neil Ricky James John 'JJ'
But that still leave JJ with one extra name.
If I was forced to name these kids while honoring all these assumed people:
Brian Arthur Frazer
Martha Jean Roxanna (or Roxanna Martha Jean, could be called 'Roxy')
This message was edited 7/8/2023, 7:19 PM
I'm afraid this does not make the parents sound especially intelligent. It basically sounds like they just threw together a bunch of combos without a thought in the world for how they looked or sounded or if they used the same names more than once.
Roxy Louise Martha Jean is cute, though I'd prefer it as Roxy Louise & Martha Jean (sisters).