Message: "Re: Naming laws and a horrible example"

[Opinions] Re: Naming laws and a horrible example

by CN (CSwe)

1/27/2007, 5:17 AM

I actually don't think the law is that strict. If you can prove that it is a name you would probably be able to name the girl Ashtyn. For example I know that Puma has been accepted and that's not really a name.
I also know that somebody wanted to name their girl Brunst gnägg (meaning Heat neigh, heat= an animal that is in a state of sexual excitement and ready to breed) Thank God for the name laws in that case!

Messages

Top 30 Swedish names for 2006 (boys and girls) · CN · 1/27/2007, 2:09 AM

•Re: Top 30 Swedish names for 2006 (boys and girls) · mum2bubba · 1/27/2007, 9:11 PM

•Re: Top 30 Swedish names for 2006 (boys and girls) · Julia · 1/27/2007, 2:22 PM

•Re: Top 30 Swedish names for 2006 (boys and girls) · Isla · 1/27/2007, 2:11 PM

•Re: Top 30 Swedish names for 2006 (boys and girls) · Ronja · 1/27/2007, 12:50 PM

•Re: Top 30 Swedish names for 2006 (boys and girls) · Elemmennope · 1/27/2007, 10:15 AM

•Re: Top 30 Swedish names for 2006 (boys and girls) · Nirvanna · 1/27/2007, 9:10 AM

•Re: Top 30 Swedish names for 2006 (boys and girls) · Lolita · 1/27/2007, 6:49 AM

•Re: Top 30 Swedish names for 2006 (boys and girls) · Egyptian Princess · 1/27/2007, 5:51 AM

•Re: Top 30 Swedish names for 2006 (boys and girls) · ceglips · 1/27/2007, 2:41 AM

•Naming laws · Soul · 1/27/2007, 3:54 AM

•Re: Naming laws · ceglips · 1/27/2007, 4:18 AM

•Re: Naming laws and a horrible example · CN · 1/27/2007, 5:17 AM

•Re: Naming laws · Soul · 1/27/2007, 4:33 AM

•Re: Naming laws · Isla · 1/27/2007, 2:07 PM

•Ditto :) · Mar · 1/27/2007, 10:49 AM

•Re: Naming laws · ceglips · 1/27/2007, 5:15 AM

•Re: Naming laws · Soul · 1/27/2007, 6:43 AM

•The trouble is . . . · Chrisell · 1/27/2007, 5:24 AM

View Message

Messages