This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: A question about surnames used on their own vs. in combination with a given name
in reply to a message by Mar
This is a matter of "Style", and is subject the the guidelines of the publisher. An English newspaper may not be aware of the distinction in Dutch practice, or may have their own rules. The AP Style guide says "lower case particles … when part of a given name … but follow individual preferences [where known]", for example Van Gogh, Van der Graaf. The New York Times says "consult the foreign copy desk" and for well known figures ensure consistency between publicity material and the news columns. For other guidelines they refer to those published by the CIA for foreign names.
vote up1vote down

Replies

In France the particle with a lower case initial - e.g., Michel de Montaigne - denotes noble status; upper case initial - e.g., Charles De Gaulle - denotes non-noble status.
It should be added that the majority of bearers of the lower case particle have adopted it without right. France, being a republic, ignores such conceits, and snobs and social climbers take advantage of the lack of regulation.
I once read that Beethoven's friends tried to persuade him to change the 'van' spelling of his Dutch surname to 'von', thus pretending to membership of the nobility, but the composer refused to do so.
vote up1vote down
In France the particle with a lower case initial - e.g., Michel de Montaigne - denotes noble status; upper case initial - e.g., Charles De Gaulle - denotes non-noble status.
It should be added that the majority of bearers of the lower case particle have adopted it without right. France, being a republic, ignores such conceits, and snobs and social climbers take advantage of the lack of regulation.
I once read that Beethoven's friends tried to persuade him to change the 'van' spelling of his Dutch surname to 'von', thus pretending to membership of the nobility, but the composer refused to do so.
vote up1vote down