[Opinions] Price
Wdyt of Price? I’m surprised it’s not popular
Replies
I'm not. Not only is it just another unattractive surname, it also is just a common noun as well, barely a name at all. It does, indeed, sound cheap and tacky.
As in what does something cost? No thanks.
On the line below your question, there's the word Tags. I think that says it all.
Just another surname name ... not the best, because of the word, but I think I'd hardly notice it. It'd sound namey enough after a while.
There are so many that are about as clunky, or worse. I think Price is a shade better than Pierce. I think these types of names may inadvertently build the character of their bearers. A normal, genuine, and friendly response is sympathetic laughter. I've seen it happen many times. Bearers of names like that must learn to laugh at themselves and not to take things personally - it isn't such a bad thing.
There are so many that are about as clunky, or worse. I think Price is a shade better than Pierce. I think these types of names may inadvertently build the character of their bearers. A normal, genuine, and friendly response is sympathetic laughter. I've seen it happen many times. Bearers of names like that must learn to laugh at themselves and not to take things personally - it isn't such a bad thing.
Terrible
I’m happy it’s not popular. Ironically enough it’s seems cheap and tawdry. It’s interesting though, I’ll give it that.
As a first name??? Very anti. It's okay as a surname.
Priceless I don't like either but it could be a cute twist on Precious I guess. But naming a child Price seems like naming them Dollar or Purchase imo
I don't like surnames as first names in general though.
Priceless I don't like either but it could be a cute twist on Precious I guess. But naming a child Price seems like naming them Dollar or Purchase imo
I don't like surnames as first names in general though.
This message was edited 12/30/2022, 8:39 AM
Yes as a fist name. I agree with you but it sounds like it should be back in.