Ok, I'm not the only one who noticed. :)
I don't dislike the names, I just found it strange, albeit interesting, that there would be so many "outdated" (apparently a bad choice of words--but you used it yourself) names and nn's as formal names used on babies born in 2004-2005.
Personally, I like a lot of the boys' names, such as
Peter,
Mark,
Ian,
David,
Alfred,
Arthur, and
George.
This message was edited 1/10/2005, 8:18 PM