Message: "no,no,no!! nt" - Behind the Name

[Opinions] no,no,no!! nt

by AriaMC (guest)

3/15/2005, 9:47 PM

in reply to a message by raindancing

Messages

Michael and Michelle: Too corny for fraternal twins? · Beloved One · 3/15/2005, 1:54 PM

•Not if they have different mn. n/t · Anna-Maria · 3/16/2005, 5:42 PM

•Re: Michael and Michelle: Too corny for fraternal twins? · DaphneHarridge · 3/16/2005, 3:55 PM

•Too similar. Don't like it. (nt) · Pink Princess · 3/15/2005, 7:40 PM

•Yes! nt · Eden · 3/15/2005, 7:00 PM

•I think so (m) · Cera · 3/15/2005, 6:22 PM

•Re: Michael and Michelle: Too corny for fraternal twins? · raindancing · 3/15/2005, 5:06 PM

•no,no,no!! nt · AriaMC · 3/15/2005, 9:47 PM

•Re: no,no,no!! nt · AriaMC · 3/15/2005, 9:49 PM

•I don't think it's all that bad really (m)... · kappeash · 3/15/2005, 3:17 PM

•OMG · kappeash · 3/15/2005, 3:19 PM

•My aunt and uncle are Michelle and Michael...(m) · Array · 3/15/2005, 2:51 PM

•definitely n/t · karen · 3/15/2005, 2:35 PM

•Yes. (nt) · Korrine · 3/15/2005, 2:32 PM

•Re: Michael and Michelle: Too corny for fraternal twins? · Lissa Hannah · 3/15/2005, 2:21 PM

•Yes! They're the SAME NAME! (m) · Miranda · 3/15/2005, 1:56 PM