View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Facts] Re: Hubert originally a short form of Hugobert?
Hubert could indeed be a contraction of Hugobert that later came to be used as the normal form (remember, there are over 1,500 years in which names like Hugobert were common; that's a lot of time for evolution, needless to say). Hubert could've originally been a nn, but I think it's rather impossible to tell.But I actually think that it's rather more likely that Hugobert was a rare "learned" lengthening of Hubert, since my reliable sources (BtN, A Dictionary of First Names by the Oxford Press, Oxygen.com's Babynamer) don't mention Hugobert in their entries about Hubert at all.

Miranda
Image hosted by Photobucket.comProud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.
vote up1vote down

Replies

HUBERT is is contraction of HUGBERT (or HUGUBERT / HUGOBERT). The earliest proof for HUGUBERT goes back to the 6th cent., whereas HUBERT, HUPERT, UBERT and others don't turn up until around 8oo.This is taken from:
Ernst Förstemann: Altdeutsche Personennamen (1906)
vote up1vote down
Thank you both Miranda and Andy for your answers! :-)
vote up1vote down