New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] Re: Dakota
in reply to a message by Linz
Well, my grandparents have a dog named Dacotah, so I really only like the name for dogs now. It's not a bad name though, so I wouldn't be horrified to see it used for a girl or boy. I prefer the NN Kota.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Along the same lines...(edited)
I know several people who have named their pets (mainly dogs) Dakota (my aunt, a friend and two other relatives included). Dakota, IMO, seems to be a name that was nice on a human for a very short amount of time - I can count on one hand the number of times I've heard it while out and about - but has remained popular in the animal-naming world! I personally wouldn't use it....
I know several people who have named their pets (mainly dogs) Dakota (my aunt, a friend and two other relatives included). Dakota, IMO, seems to be a name that was nice on a human for a very short amount of time - I can count on one hand the number of times I've heard it while out and about - but has remained popular in the animal-naming world! I personally wouldn't use it....
This message was edited 3/21/2008, 9:38 AM
1
People names on animals
I really love people names for animals, but I get so used to hearing those names for dogs and cats that I start disliking them for people. Lily, Daisy, Dacotah / Dakota, Delilah, Gracie, Molly, Amos, Asa, and many more are all animal names to me. But I think many people names are getting popular for animals.
I really love people names for animals, but I get so used to hearing those names for dogs and cats that I start disliking them for people. Lily, Daisy, Dacotah / Dakota, Delilah, Gracie, Molly, Amos, Asa, and many more are all animal names to me. But I think many people names are getting popular for animals.
This message was edited 3/21/2008, 9:46 AM
1
I totally agree!
1