[Opinions] I LOVE it, but I have one concern.
in reply to a message by Marla
That's definitely exciting. I like all four names, and I'm glad she picked them for the right reasons. My main problem is using Beowulf as a fn. I have nothing against her choice of it, but it will stick out undoubtably and although she likes it, her son may regret it later on. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for using literary names- this is coming from the person who wants to name her daughters Arwen, Idril, and Luthien.She could amend it to:
Xavier Beowulf
Lux Amadeus, orXavier Beowulf
Lux Amedea- Amadeus on a girl doesn't faze me terribly as a Mozart fanatic, but it doesn't hurt to consider alternatives. Lux is perfect, by the way.Even if she can't bear to change it, the set is amazing. I'm so glad they won't be Aiden and McKenzie or anything in that style!
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Marla  ·  6/4/2008, 10:38 PM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  anon  ·  6/5/2008, 10:30 PM
Ummmmm, right. Not seeing the "rad-ness" of this set. (m)  ·  Pink Princess  ·  6/5/2008, 8:00 PM
Those are certainly bold choices. /nt  ·  Lillian  ·  6/5/2008, 7:56 PM
X's response  ·  Siri  ·  6/5/2008, 3:47 PM
Re: X's response  ·  Marla  ·  6/5/2008, 4:52 PM
Beowulf?  ·  August Rose  ·  6/5/2008, 2:35 PM
I LOVE it, but I have one concern.  ·  Phoenix-san  ·  6/5/2008, 2:07 PM
Re: I LOVE it, but I have one concern.  ·  Marla  ·  6/5/2008, 4:50 PM
It would be cool if Lux Amadeus were a boy. nt  ·  Aileen  ·  6/5/2008, 1:36 PM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  lac  ·  6/5/2008, 11:33 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Zora  ·  6/5/2008, 10:49 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Dot  ·  6/5/2008, 11:44 AM
They'd be great if they were both boys. :/ nt  ·  Akua Topaz  ·  6/5/2008, 10:12 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  queenv  ·  6/5/2008, 9:57 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  number1212  ·  6/5/2008, 8:15 AM
Not sharing your enthusiasm...  ·  Amy J  ·  6/5/2008, 7:51 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Jasmine  ·  6/5/2008, 7:27 AM
Oh duh! I thought they were both boys at first  ·  Kirke  ·  6/5/2008, 6:30 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Wordsmith  ·  6/5/2008, 5:36 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Kirke  ·  6/5/2008, 5:00 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Murasaki  ·  6/5/2008, 4:49 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Lotta  ·  6/5/2008, 3:13 AM
I'm torn . . .  ·  Atheling  ·  6/5/2008, 2:26 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  ElizainEngland  ·  6/5/2008, 2:15 AM
Dumbstruck (nt)  ·  Jonquil  ·  6/5/2008, 1:59 AM
Eeek  ·  Chrisell  ·  6/5/2008, 1:36 AM
Gee, I guess you're right... (M)  ·  Marla  ·  6/5/2008, 4:43 PM
Re: Gee, I guess you're right... (M)  ·  Chrisell  ·  6/5/2008, 5:00 PM
Re: Gee, I guess you're right... (M)  ·  Marla  ·  6/5/2008, 5:21 PM
I agree, too. (nt)  ·  Kate  ·  6/5/2008, 10:01 AM
agree  ·  mirfak  ·  6/5/2008, 8:48 AM
Re: agree  ·  Marla  ·  6/5/2008, 4:45 PM
Re: agree  ·  queenv  ·  6/5/2008, 6:52 PM
I must agree. (m)  ·  MariaNikolaievnaRomanova  ·  6/6/2008, 7:05 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Laura W  ·  6/5/2008, 12:40 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Sabrina Fair  ·  6/4/2008, 11:32 PM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Sweetly Broken  ·  6/4/2008, 11:08 PM