Names
Introduction
Browse Surnames
Advanced Search
Most Common
Namesakes
Submitted Surnames
Interact
Message Boards
Submit a Name
Tools
Meanings
First Name Site
Place Name Site
Menu
Sign In
Register
First Name Site
Place Name Site
Introduction
Browse Surnames
Advanced Search
Most Common
Namesakes
Submitted Surnames
Message Boards
Submit a Name
Meanings
Sign In
Register
View Message
Home
»
Message Boards
»
All Messages
◄
Prev
►
Next
New Post
Search
Any time
Advanced
Help
[Opinions] Re: agree
by
queenv
6/5/2008, 6:52 PM
in reply to
a message by Marla
It is an unfounded assumption that they will have a "jumpstart on awesomeness" because of their names, and a poor reason for giving such names to begin with.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Messages
Compact replies
▾
full-text
compact
Newest first
▾
newest
active
votes
oldest
OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
Marla
·
6/4/2008, 10:38 PM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
anon
·
6/5/2008, 10:30 PM
•
Ummmmm, right. Not seeing the "rad-ness" of this set. (m)
·
Pink Princess
·
6/5/2008, 8:00 PM
•
Those are certainly bold choices. /nt
·
Lillian
·
6/5/2008, 7:56 PM
•
X's response
·
Siri
·
6/5/2008, 3:47 PM
•
Re: X's response
·
Marla
·
6/5/2008, 4:52 PM
•
Beowulf?
·
August Rose
·
6/5/2008, 2:35 PM
•
I LOVE it, but I have one concern.
·
Phoenix-san
·
6/5/2008, 2:07 PM
•
Re: I LOVE it, but I have one concern.
·
Marla
·
6/5/2008, 4:50 PM
•
It would be cool if Lux Amadeus were a boy. nt
·
Aileen
·
6/5/2008, 1:36 PM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
lac
·
6/5/2008, 11:33 AM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
Zora
·
6/5/2008, 10:49 AM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
Dot
·
6/5/2008, 11:44 AM
•
They'd be great if they were both boys. :/ nt
·
Akua Topaz
·
6/5/2008, 10:12 AM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
queenv
·
6/5/2008, 9:57 AM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
number1212
·
6/5/2008, 8:15 AM
•
Not sharing your enthusiasm...
·
Amy J
·
6/5/2008, 7:51 AM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
Jasmine
·
6/5/2008, 7:27 AM
•
Oh duh! I thought they were both boys at first
·
Kirke
·
6/5/2008, 6:30 AM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
Wordsmith
·
6/5/2008, 5:36 AM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
Kirke
·
6/5/2008, 5:00 AM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
Murasaki
·
6/5/2008, 4:49 AM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
Lotta
·
6/5/2008, 3:13 AM
•
I'm torn . . .
·
Atheling
·
6/5/2008, 2:26 AM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
ElizainEngland
·
6/5/2008, 2:15 AM
•
Dumbstruck (nt)
·
Jonquil
·
6/5/2008, 1:59 AM
•
Eeek
·
Chrisell
·
6/5/2008, 1:36 AM
•
Gee, I guess you're right... (M)
·
Marla
·
6/5/2008, 4:43 PM
•
Re: Gee, I guess you're right... (M)
·
Chrisell
·
6/5/2008, 5:00 PM
•
Re: Gee, I guess you're right... (M)
·
Marla
·
6/5/2008, 5:21 PM
•
I agree, too. (nt)
·
Kate
·
6/5/2008, 10:01 AM
•
agree
·
mirfak
·
6/5/2008, 8:48 AM
•
Re: agree
·
Marla
·
6/5/2008, 4:45 PM
•
Re: agree
·
queenv
·
6/5/2008, 6:52 PM
•
I must agree. (m)
·
MariaNikolaievnaRomanova
·
6/6/2008, 7:05 AM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
Laura W
·
6/5/2008, 12:40 AM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
Sabrina Fair
·
6/4/2008, 11:32 PM
•
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!
·
Sweetly Broken
·
6/4/2008, 11:08 PM