New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] Really?
in reply to a message by Laree
Tanith seems to fit in very, very well with all the current names. I see on a child much more easily than a lot of the names I hear on the board. Hmm, I'll have to think of that.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Well, you'll notice...
... that none of my feminine names tend to carry much weight. Even my more "boy-ish" favorites (Quinn, Sloane, Hollis) are rather light. So I guess I have a hard time with "bulky-er" names, which is what I concider Tanith to be.
Also, now I think about it, I really don't even like weighty names on boy's (my favorites being River, Shannon, August, ect.). I guess I'm just a feather-weight namer :-)
... that none of my feminine names tend to carry much weight. Even my more "boy-ish" favorites (Quinn, Sloane, Hollis) are rather light. So I guess I have a hard time with "bulky-er" names, which is what I concider Tanith to be.
Also, now I think about it, I really don't even like weighty names on boy's (my favorites being River, Shannon, August, ect.). I guess I'm just a feather-weight namer :-)
1