View Message

[Opinions] Koen vs. Cohen
I know many people find Cohen to be offensive. What about the Dutch version of Koen? It means "Bold and Daring". I really like the meaning. If a dutch person (with a clearly Dutch ln), such as my husband, named his son Koen, would that still be found offensive?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

If I were you...I'd name my kid whatever I wanted. People are naming their daughters Gypsy these days and no one says a word, but Cohen is offensive? I don't understand that logic. The name Jude could also be considered a racial term, but that's currently a favorite here on the board. I just don't get it.If you are concerned about controversy, though, you could always go with an alternate spelling; Koen isn't bad, but maybe Kohen would be good, too. I kinda like that spelling. :)
vote up1
I don't find [m]Gypsy offensive but probably because I have no assocation with them or think it's 'bad' or 'negative'. I think it's a pretty name I wouldn't use it but it's pretty for either gender. I never heard of Cohen as being offensive nor Jude.

This message was edited 8/23/2008, 10:19 PM

vote up1
The problem with Gypsy is that it's considered derogative nowadays, the accepted term being Rom or Roma.
vote up1
I see hmm too bad it's so nice looking. Roma is nice!
vote up1
I'd consider Gypsy offensivejude borderline
vote up1
Ditto.And utterly ridic.Jude as racist? How so? I've never heard Jude as a racist term. Wop, Chink, Nigger, Gyp, Jap - those are offensive. Jude? How?
vote up1
Jude...pronounced Yoo-deh is the German word for "jew"...but I don't really think that makes it offensive. After all it was a biblical name and is pronounced differently in English.
vote up1
When I first heard Jude as a name, 'Jew' was the first thing I thought. I thought it was a really really weird word to use as a name. Now I've come accustomed to seeing it used, but I think a lot of people would still find it odd or yes, maybe even offensive. Oh and, don't forget, English isn't the only language out there. So just because something isn't a racist term to you, doesn't mean it's not a racist term to anyone else...
vote up1
Its the German word for JewI think that's probably the only reason. And since WWII is over and no one's got to wear it pinned to their clothes, it's not really an issue.
vote up1
http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/1052/493260.JPGJude literally means "jew" doesn't it?
I am also not sure, but I think I have read somewhere that the name Judah predates the term Jew/Jude. Someone else almost anyone else would be able to clarify this though.
vote up1
I was typing up a big, long, overly complicated message that only half made sense to me, then I found this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etymology_of_the_word_JewBut no, Jude doesn't literally mean Jew. Jude is from Yehudah, from which Judah is also derived, which means 'praise; thanks'. How Jude/Judah came to refer to Jews is another story.However, the German word for Jew is Jude. In that sense, yes, it literally means Jew.
vote up1
I am not sure how American families whose last name is spelled Koen usually pronounce it, but using the Dutch pronunciation for that name in the USA would be bound to cause some problems. The child would have to constantly be correcting people as to his name's pronunciation. You could always use Cowan, which is pronounced almost the same way as Cohen. It should be pointed out that though the great majority of people with the surname Cohen are of Jewish ancestry, Cohen is also an Irish surname with a completely different derivation. There are Irish families named Cohen who have no Jewish ancestry. So it's not really an exclusively Jewish name.
vote up1
As a Dutch name that has nothing to with Cohen, I guess it's fine for Dutch people to use Koen but I don't think it's a very attractive name in other languages.As Cohen goes, I personally don't find offensive. It's a Jewish surname, that's all, I don't think all the people whose surname is Cohen are necessarily very conscious of their priestly status. But as a given name, I find it ridiculous, you might as well name a child Greenblatt or Goldnagel.
vote up1
I don't think it's offensive
vote up1
Question: Why is Cohen considered offensive?I'm guessing it's some biblical reason? I'm sorry - I'm confused!
vote up1
?!Would English people be offended if you'd use "Jackson" or Dutch if you'd use "Schuyler". I'm not all that sure if Jewish people would get seriously offended by someone using Cohen. I would not stop using it, just because it's a Jewish surname.
vote up1
I don't think the point of the discussion was that Jews would be offended if non-Jews use Cohen simply because it was Jewish. I think the point that was attempting to be conveyed was that the Kohanim were descendants of Aaron who held a special role within the Temple (the Temple is sacred to Jews) and performed duties sacred to Jews, and it would therefore be an affront to the Jewish people to use a name associated with such a history. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kohanim

This message was edited 8/23/2008, 1:29 PM

vote up1
Okay, that makes a bit more sense. But am I the only one that thinks that there are people that tend to get offended a bit too easily? Anyway, thanks for clearing it up for me :)
vote up1
No prob. :) I personally am not offended by someone using Cohen as a firstname, but I'm Reform. I'd love to hear opinions from the Charedim on the matter.
vote up1
What I don't get, is that when people use it as a name they think about it as just a surname. I seriously doubt all of the people whose surname is Cohen are necessarily so conscious of what it implies. I had a relative by marriage with this surname who married a Christian and was generally quite secular. I also don't get why Levi isn't considered offensive at this point, aren't Levites also of priestly descent?I'm not advocating the use of Cohen as a first name btw, offensive or not offensive I find it horrid as a given name.
vote up1
If we're determining offensiveness using the criteria that has been established for finding Cohen offensive, then Levi would be considered an offending name also.In regards to Levi, there is some debate that the name has rather sexual connotations, symbolising his mother's hope that Yaakov would...not neglect his marital duties. :)
vote up1
It's an interesting questionAs a Christian the only name that I find offensive is Calvary (I still cannot believe I found someone who would actually USE it) and that's it. Madonna is a bit...over-the-top but not offensive to me.I've always stayed away from both names as a sign of respect, merely because of the arguments that a former member made - Miss/Mrs Claire. You might want to search out her posts.
vote up1
I'm kind of embarrassed that that was MY message!
vote up1
Why? Have you changed your mind since?
vote up1
I'm embarrassed...No. I'm embarrassed because I've caused an argument!

This message was edited 8/23/2008, 12:34 PM

vote up1
Don't worryPeople cause arguments here all the time. I guess we've all seen worse.
vote up1
Something to do with it being a Jewish surname.
vote up1
Koen is better, provided you don't pronounce it like Cohen.
vote up1
Cohen and Koen are not pronounced the sameKoen is KOON not KO-un, if he has a very Dutch LN, I think it's strange to say KO-un (but of course, I am Dutch). Having said that, I quite like Koen, I like it better than Cohen, because it's meant to be a FN and not a LN like Cohen is. Also another way spelling Koen in Dutch is Coen, if you're looking for an alternative to Cohen, maybe that's an idea as well.
vote up1
Koen looks weird and I want to say "KOHN". Cohen looks much nicer but I wouldn't use either of them.
vote up1
1. I don't find Cohen offensive. It's just a Jewish surname. 2. Koen is pronounced "Koon"3. No, it would not be offensive.
vote up1