[Opinions] Re: Juniors and "Numbers"
in reply to a message by queenv
I don't like it, honestley. It seems incredibly egotistical and uncreative, and I think every child deserves their own name and the chance to be their own person. I would fight my husband tooth and nail on this- particularly if he wanted a junior, or even a III. If it was say a 4th or 5th, I'd be more open to it, because I'm a big one for traditions, but even then I don't think I'd be happy. If he really felt strongly about it, I'd be willing to consider either or both names as middle names. Wether I liked the names or not wopuld have to be factored in, ofcourse.
That being said, I definitley don't feel as strongly about other people doing it- I don't like it, but each to their own, especially if they are carrying on a tradition, as in your case, and not simply just trying to recreate the son in the fathers image. I just really don't like it for my kids.
My aunty broke tradition when naming my cousin. They had boy/girl twins 6th years ago. My uncle, who is a Jr. wanted his son to be Frederick Vaughn the 3rd. My aunty said no way, not happening, so he was named James Frederick. His twin sister is Charlotte Sophie.
That being said, I definitley don't feel as strongly about other people doing it- I don't like it, but each to their own, especially if they are carrying on a tradition, as in your case, and not simply just trying to recreate the son in the fathers image. I just really don't like it for my kids.
My aunty broke tradition when naming my cousin. They had boy/girl twins 6th years ago. My uncle, who is a Jr. wanted his son to be Frederick Vaughn the 3rd. My aunty said no way, not happening, so he was named James Frederick. His twin sister is Charlotte Sophie.
Replies
Uncreative? Yes, definitely. And my husband did have a streak of egotism, which was sometimes a bad thing and sometimes a good thing!