View Message

New Post
Search
Help
[Opinions] Re: No... (m)
by gaelruadh19
2/8/2009, 10:34 PM
in reply to a message by Nikki
Agreed. James is a handsome, masculine name and it does not belong on a female; Ashley, Kelly, Casey, Madison, and Leslie seem to have been claimed by girls, and would somebody please explain to me why gender-neutral names gradually become female-only territory?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

James...for a girl (sort of)  ·  New_Chloe  ·  2/7/2009, 5:20 PM
•Please no-!  ·  gaelruadh19  ·  2/8/2009, 10:32 PM
•Re: James...for a girl (sort of)  ·  sonny20  ·  2/8/2009, 5:29 PM
•No . . . (really)  ·  Bear  ·  2/8/2009, 3:22 PM
•Re: James...for a girl (sort of)  ·  Lily8  ·  2/8/2009, 4:30 AM
•No... (m)  ·  Nikki  ·  2/8/2009, 4:05 AM
•Re: No... (m)  ·  gaelruadh19  ·  2/8/2009, 10:34 PM
•Re: No... (m)  ·  RegalAmethyst  ·  2/9/2009, 6:55 AM
•Oh No! Only Jamesetta or Jamesina. nt  ·  I_Love_Jesus  ·  2/7/2009, 9:39 PM
•Re: James...for a girl (sort of)  ·  gigibee  ·  2/7/2009, 8:43 PM
•Re: James...for a girl (sort of)  ·  Flute  ·  2/7/2009, 6:34 PM
•If at all, use it as a middle name only.  ·  gaelruadh19  ·  2/8/2009, 10:35 PM
•Yes [m]  ·  Sabrina Fair  ·  2/7/2009, 5:59 PM
•Re: James...for a girl (sort of)  ·  RegalAmethyst  ·  2/7/2009, 5:29 PM
•Re: James...for a girl (sort of)  ·  New_Chloe  ·  2/7/2009, 5:49 PM
•Re: Jamesina is wonderful  ·  Bear  ·  2/8/2009, 4:38 PM
•Re: Jamesina is wonderful  ·  gaelruadh19  ·  2/8/2009, 10:38 PM
•Re: James...for a girl (sort of)  ·  RegalAmethyst  ·  2/7/2009, 5:54 PM
•True enough! nt  ·  New_Chloe  ·  2/7/2009, 5:56 PM
•Re: James...for a girl (sort of)  ·  Laurenzia  ·  2/7/2009, 5:28 PM
•Ivy Jamesina is lovely!!  ·  New_Chloe  ·  2/7/2009, 6:00 PM
•Re: James...for a girl (sort of)  ·  AnnaMichelle  ·  2/7/2009, 5:22 PM
•Re: James...for a girl (sort of)  ·  AnnaMichelle  ·  2/7/2009, 5:28 PM
•Thanks! (m)  ·  New_Chloe  ·  2/7/2009, 5:23 PM
•Re: Thanks! (m)  ·  AnnaMichelle  ·  2/7/2009, 5:24 PM